LATAM Competition Comments and Rubric #1
Description
| Project Acquisition and use of data | Relevance and specific conclusions of Decred Functionality | ease of use and accessibility | Execution | Documentation | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital Identity | 12 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 56 |
| PoP | 15 | 18 | 15 | 18 | 15 | 81 |
| Bitmoney | 14 | 10 | 12 | 13 | 16 | 65 |
| DCRTimeExplorer | 15 | 17 | 15 | 17 | 15 | 79 |
| DecredMemories | 15 | 15 | 14 | 10 | 10 | 64 |
| iPati | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 50 |
Digital Identity: This is a good problem to choose, but it appears that you’re going to end up with a new trusted party who has custody of the ID data. I would further explore why people will want to use this service as their trusted ID provider.
People of Pi: This is a creative idea, and has lots of future potential with Decred. You can also apply quality filters to see which contributed have the most valuable content on Pi. Well done.
Bitmoney: Price analysis is interesting, but it would be more interesting if you can show how this price model has historically performed when you compare it to the market.
DCRTimeExplorer: Creative use of digital timestamping and making it applicable to the Decred blockchain
Decred Memories: This is a good idea to make a Decred snapshot with notable news and events. Documentation can improve, and you can further enhance this project by adding in notable social media data.
iPati: The video content was not subtitled in English, so I could not understand everything, but it seems unclear how this is this related to the Decred blockchain.