[JOSS REVIEW] Outdated Links/ Descriptions

[schuhmaj]

The issue

Also, a minor thing (i.e., this is not a blocking criterion in the context of the JOSS Review.), the documentation contains some outdated/ broken links. E.g.:

• The link to the HDF5 library in the install guide: Faulty Link https://portal.hdfgroup.org/display/HDF5/HDF5
• The EXP Tutorial Page doesn't correctly link to the example repository: Faulty Link https://github.com/orgs/EXP-examples

The example repositories READMEs are sometimes out-of-date. E.g.

• Here, the README.md lists bullet points which don't exist (anymore?)

---

This issue is part of the JOSS review: openjournals/joss-reviews#7302

[michael-petersen]

EXP-docs piece is being addressed by EXP-code/EXP-docs#32.

I believe that the pyEXP-examples README.md issue has been addressed already?

[The9Cat]

The pyEXP-examples Recipes README.md is consistent; the directories all exist. Some of these directories are placeholders, however, waiting for contributions.

[michael-petersen]

The README.md links have been sorted out in cc29e51, along with an explanation behind the structure.

[michael-petersen]

Finished with the merge of #100.