Skip to content

Odd/even margins vs. regulations #5

@dborowiec10

Description

@dborowiec10

Regarding the:

\newgeometry{left=35mm, right=25mm, top=25mm, bottom=25mm, asymmetric, includeheadfoot}

in main.tex.

The asymmetric option seems to be undoing the job of setting different left and right margins, i.e. margins are the same on odd/even pages in the generated PDF (I'm using Overleaf). This happens when the twoside option is used in:

\documentclass[twoside,12pt,dvipsnames]{report}

Setting up geometry as part of the \usepackage seems to fix the issue, like so:

\documentclass[twoside,12pt,dvipsnames]{report}
\linespread{1.5}
\usepackage[
    paper=a4paper,
    inner=35mm,
    outer=25mm,
    top=25mm,
    bottom=25mm,
    includeheadfoot
]{geometry}

On a side note, from the university regulations:

To allow for printing and annotations which might be undertaken by an examiner at the
examination stage or if the candidate wishes to have a copy bound for their individual use:
• The page size should be A4 (210 x 297 mm)
• Margins - top, bottom and right-hand side, should be 25 mm. The left-hand side margin should be 35 mm
• Line spacing should be 1.5

I might be interpreting this wrong but it seems that the regulations request the inner margin to be 35mm and outer one ("right-hand side") to be 25mm for printing/binding - i.e. additional inner space to account for the bind? I have seen several submitted theses in preparation for formatting my own and its a mixture of equidistant margins in some theses and different margins in others (including across SCC) which makes things a bit confusing. Is there a more detailed guide for SCC theses?

Would this be the desired effect?
image

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions