LCPP TGA 10 and 20 K/min

[arinta-paavola]

Hi,

Found out and double-checked that the corresponding TGA data at 10 and 20 K/min submitted by LCPP are duplicates (i.e. LCPP_TGA_N2_10K_1 is identical with LCPP_TGA_N2_20K_1 and so on). Similarly, the reported initial sample masses in their Readme.md are duplicates.

Hope the correct data would be available soon. Thanks!

[rmcdermo]

@leventon will have a look

[leventon]

Will check it out and edit as needed. Thanks for catching this.

…

On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 9:52 AM Randy McDermott ***@***.***> wrote: @leventon <https://github.com/leventon> will have a look — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#24?email_source=notifications&email_token=ADBUSGJ47NHRI4ZIHP4PW73RGEE4BA5CNFSM4LDBQ3RKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEOBTVFI#issuecomment-595802773>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADBUSGOQT57KW5O46BZ7P5TRGEE4BANCNFSM4LDBQ3RA> .

-- -------------------------------------- Isaac Leventon, PhD National Institute of Standards and Technology Fire Research Division Building 224 - Room A265 Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (301) 975-6887

[leventon]

Finally was able to sit down with this, my apologies for the delay.

I checked the edited files on the repo, my local copy of submitted data, and then downloaded a new copy of the files that were first shared with us by email. All of these have the same issue that you pointed out - TGA data at 10 and 20 K/min are identical. It appears that we do not have unique data for these two heating rates.

I will send a request to the contributing lab for the original .csv files for each of the triplicate tests at both of these heating rates. Hopefully at least one of these datasets is correct and I'll just have to replace the other one. For now, I cannot tell which one to edit though.

I'll update and close this issue once that new dataset is available. Thanks for catching this for us.