Skip to content

Add more sample-level result tests #51

@GordStephen

Description

@GordStephen

#50 fixes a really obvious error in sample-level surplus result processing that should have been caught by automated testing (in a compiled language the package wouldn't even have built). We need better test coverage for these more niche result specs.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions