-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Open
Labels
layer:coreRegarding the core protocol (cost tracking, transactional fabric, etc)Regarding the core protocol (cost tracking, transactional fabric, etc)project:papertag:cyberneticsFor issues relating to systemic automationFor issues relating to systemic automationtag:economicsRegarding economics: dynamics, costs, incentives, etcRegarding economics: dynamics, costs, incentives, etctag:governanceHaving to do with governance in general (global,companies, resources, etc)Having to do with governance in general (global,companies, resources, etc)type:discussionDiscussion or ideas for future direction, input welcome (don't be shy)Discussion or ideas for future direction, input welcome (don't be shy)
Milestone
Description
This is an idea that's been swimming around in my head for quite some time: UBI automation. Instead of having people vote on what the UBI should be, instead pick a wide selection of participants in these four industries:
- Food
- Housing
- Healthcare
- Education
For each industry, do a 1 year moving average of consumer costs, then sum these averages all together. What you get is the average cost of basic necessities. Now, you can have people decide on a UBI multiplier for that value, 0 <= m <= 2 such that the final UBI amount (yearly) is:
m * (mavg(food) + mavg(housing) + mavg(healthcare) + mavg(education))
The governable factors here being m and which blocs are selected for the various industries. This system acts as a guide for the UBI value as opposed to people setting an arbitrary value.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
layer:coreRegarding the core protocol (cost tracking, transactional fabric, etc)Regarding the core protocol (cost tracking, transactional fabric, etc)project:papertag:cyberneticsFor issues relating to systemic automationFor issues relating to systemic automationtag:economicsRegarding economics: dynamics, costs, incentives, etcRegarding economics: dynamics, costs, incentives, etctag:governanceHaving to do with governance in general (global,companies, resources, etc)Having to do with governance in general (global,companies, resources, etc)type:discussionDiscussion or ideas for future direction, input welcome (don't be shy)Discussion or ideas for future direction, input welcome (don't be shy)