Update on 10/30

[cheny51]

We are wondering:

• A distribution of split factor b vs. changing lambda arrival rate within the appropriate constraint for while keeping the same
• The meaning of the intersection point (where both user's average age is the same), is this good or bad?
• We think that this give us a rough idea of how much resource we needed to assign that would allow both user to perform most of their packets in the given time. If we steer resource allocation more left or right, then their job completion rate would not be the optimal.

May be we need plots for:
Is there a range of optimal split factor where <both> user can serve at least X(percentage > 1) packets/jobs. (favoring unequally)
Is there a range of optimal split factor where <both> user can serve 50% of their packets/jobs (favoring equally)
`Is there a range of optimal split factor where user able to finish their task in the given time?

Then we can say:
Does allocating resources such that both user has the same average age actually is good for both user?

The splitting factor b affects these resources:

1. The split factor of time duration is changed in TDMA
2. The split factor of serve duration is changed in FDMA

To-do:

1. Add count number of packets got through
2. Delay plot is missing included back!
3. Block Diagram for FD
4. TD:
   4.1 Find a range of b such that at least X(percentage > 1) packets/jobs was served
   4.2 Find a range of b such that at least 50% packets/jobs was done

[cheny51]

How was the 5/mu determined

[deryam]

5/mu, you can consider this to be a time constant for an exponential service time. The CDF is F(x)=1-e^(-x/mu). When x=5mu, you make sure (almost ) that the packet is served.