From 375aac33775c843947d03936ecce05ce24dc77b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "codeflash-ai[bot]"
 <148906541+codeflash-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 20:46:02 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Optimize fibonacci
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

The optimized code achieves a **71x speedup** (7082%) by eliminating the exponential time complexity of the original naive recursive Fibonacci implementation.

**What changed:**
1. **Integer inputs now use iterative computation** – A simple `O(n)` loop with two variables (`a`, `b`) replaces the recursive tree, avoiding exponential branching entirely.
2. **Non-integer inputs use memoization** – A `Map` cache stores previously computed results, preventing redundant recursive calls while preserving the original semantics for edge cases like `fibonacci(1.5)`.

**Why this is faster:**
The original recursive implementation has `O(2^n)` time complexity because each call spawns two more calls, leading to massive redundant computation. For `fibonacci(25)`, this results in millions of duplicate calls. The iterative approach computes each Fibonacci number exactly once in a tight loop, reducing complexity to `O(n)` with `O(1)` memory. For the common case of integer inputs (which all tests use), this is drastically faster.

**Test case performance:**
- **Small inputs (n=0-15)**: Speedup is modest but measurable; the iterative loop has minimal overhead.
- **Moderate inputs (n=20-25)**: The original implementation takes seconds (tests allow up to 2-5 seconds), while the optimized version completes in microseconds. The annotated test for `fibonacci(25)` shows this is where the optimization shines—original complexity explodes here.
- **Edge cases (negative, floats, strings)**: The optimized code preserves all original behavior, including returning negative inputs as-is and handling float recursion via the memoized path.

**Impact on workloads:**
Since no `function_references` are provided, we can't determine if this is in a hot path. However, any caller repeatedly computing Fibonacci numbers (e.g., in a loop or batch processing) will see compounding benefits. The optimization is most effective for `n > 15`, where the naive approach becomes prohibitively slow.
---
 code_to_optimize_js/fibonacci.js | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/code_to_optimize_js/fibonacci.js b/code_to_optimize_js/fibonacci.js
index b0ab2b51c..15017f4c4 100644
--- a/code_to_optimize_js/fibonacci.js
+++ b/code_to_optimize_js/fibonacci.js
@@ -12,7 +12,32 @@ function fibonacci(n) {
     if (n <= 1) {
         return n;
     }
-    return fibonacci(n - 1) + fibonacci(n - 2);
+
+    // For integer inputs use an iterative O(n) loop with constant memory
+    // This preserves exact integer Fibonacci values and avoids recursion/branch explosion.
+    if (Number.isInteger(n)) {
+        let a = 0;
+        let b = 1;
+        // iterate from 2..n inclusive
+        for (let i = 2; i <= n; i++) {
+            const tmp = a + b;
+            a = b;
+            b = tmp;
+        }
+        return b;
+    }
+
+    // For non-integer inputs preserve original recursive semantics but memoize
+    // to eliminate exponential recomputation while returning identical results.
+    const cache = new Map();
+    function fib(k) {
+        if (k <= 1) return k;
+        if (cache.has(k)) return cache.get(k);
+        const val = fib(k - 1) + fib(k - 2);
+        cache.set(k, val);
+        return val;
+    }
+    return fib(n);
 }
 
 /**