From edf70e5968d7530676e759a989a58518e7eb03ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "codeflash-ai[bot]"
 <148906541+codeflash-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 21:25:12 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Optimize fibonacci
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

The optimized code achieves a **1140x speedup** (from 33.8ms to 29.6μs) by replacing the exponential-time recursive algorithm with a linear-time iterative approach for the most common case: non-negative integers.

**Key Changes:**

1. **Fast Path for Integers (O(n) vs O(2^n))**: The optimization adds a check for `Number.isInteger(n) && n >= 0` and computes Fibonacci iteratively using just two variables (`a` and `b`). This eliminates the exponential explosion of recursive calls that occurs with the naive implementation—for example, `fibonacci(20)` requires ~21,891 recursive calls in the original but only 19 iterations in the optimized version.

2. **Preserves Original Semantics**: For edge cases like negative numbers, floats, or string coercions, the code falls back to the original recursive implementation (`slow()`), ensuring behavioral compatibility.

**Why This Works:**

- **Eliminates Redundant Computation**: The naive recursion recomputes the same Fibonacci values exponentially many times (e.g., `fibonacci(2)` is called thousands of times when computing `fibonacci(20)`). The iterative approach computes each value exactly once.

- **Minimal Memory Overhead**: Uses O(1) space instead of O(n) call stack depth, preventing stack overflow on larger inputs.

**Test Results Show:**

- **Large inputs benefit massively**: Performance tests computing `fibonacci(0)` through `fibonacci(30)` now complete in microseconds instead of seconds. The test expecting completion under 3000ms would pass trivially with the optimized version.

- **Small inputs remain fast**: Basic cases (0-10) already execute quickly but still benefit from eliminating function call overhead.

- **Edge cases preserved**: Tests with negative numbers, floats (e.g., `fibonacci(1.5)`), and string coercion (`fibonacci('6')`) still pass because the fallback path maintains exact original behavior.

**Impact:**
For typical workloads using integer inputs (which represent 100% of canonical Fibonacci use cases), this optimization delivers transformative performance gains while maintaining full backward compatibility for unusual inputs.
---
 code_to_optimize_js/fibonacci.js | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/code_to_optimize_js/fibonacci.js b/code_to_optimize_js/fibonacci.js
index b0ab2b51c..1f79293dd 100644
--- a/code_to_optimize_js/fibonacci.js
+++ b/code_to_optimize_js/fibonacci.js
@@ -12,7 +12,28 @@ function fibonacci(n) {
     if (n <= 1) {
         return n;
     }
-    return fibonacci(n - 1) + fibonacci(n - 2);
+
+    // Fast path for non-negative integer inputs (O(n) time, O(1) memory)
+    if (Number.isInteger(n) && n >= 0) {
+        let a = 0;
+        let b = 1;
+        for (let i = 2; i <= n; i++) {
+            const c = a + b;
+            a = b;
+            b = c;
+        }
+        return b;
+    }
+
+    // Fallback to the original recursive behavior for other numeric inputs
+    function slow(x) {
+        if (x <= 1) {
+            return x;
+        }
+        return slow(x - 1) + slow(x - 2);
+    }
+
+    return slow(n);
 }
 
 /**