Replies: 1 comment
-
|
So currently CT identifies them by the filename and if they aren't like the other filenames it will mark it as a scanner page. So if it's just:
But you do bring up and interesting option that we could use the same cover matching process to search for scanner pages... I'd want to do some testing to see how often it has false-positives but it could make removing them easier |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I've been going through my library and attempting to identify scanner pages on all my issues. I've noticed that it's not catching some of them. It is very accurate and will catch most of them. However, there are a few that are not detected. With this being said, is there a process to submit images so they are caught in a later release? Is there desire to continually add them as they're discovered?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions