|
| 1 | +/* |
| 2 | + Liskov Substitution Principle (LCP)... |
| 3 | +*/ |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +console.log('Liskov Substitution Principle (LCP)...') |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +console.log('\nBad implementation of Liskov Substitution Principle (LCP)...') |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +interface IBadAnimal { |
| 10 | + walk(): void |
| 11 | +} |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +abstract class BadAnimal implements IBadAnimal { |
| 14 | + public abstract walk(): void |
| 15 | +} |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +function walk(animal: BadAnimal) { |
| 18 | + animal.walk() |
| 19 | +} |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +class BadDog extends BadAnimal { |
| 22 | + public walk(): void { |
| 23 | + console.log('Dog walking!') |
| 24 | + } |
| 25 | +} |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +class BadFish extends BadAnimal { |
| 28 | + public walk(): void { |
| 29 | + throw new Error('Fish can not fly') |
| 30 | + } |
| 31 | +} |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +console.log(`\n\`\`\`\ninterface IBadAnimal { |
| 34 | + walk(): void |
| 35 | +} |
| 36 | +
|
| 37 | +abstract class BadAnimal implements IBadAnimal { |
| 38 | + public abstract walk(): void |
| 39 | +} |
| 40 | +
|
| 41 | +function walk(animal: BadAnimal) { |
| 42 | + animal.walk() |
| 43 | +} |
| 44 | +
|
| 45 | +class BadDog extends BadAnimal { |
| 46 | + public walk(): void { |
| 47 | + console.log('Dog walking!') |
| 48 | + } |
| 49 | +} |
| 50 | +
|
| 51 | +class BadFish extends BadAnimal { |
| 52 | + public walk(): void { |
| 53 | + throw new Error('Fish can not fly') |
| 54 | + } |
| 55 | +}\n\`\`\``) |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +console.log( |
| 58 | + '\nThis is a bad implementation of Liskov Substitution Principle (LCP),\n' + |
| 59 | + 'because the "BadFish" class implements the "walk" method which produces a\n' + |
| 60 | + 'different side effect than the "walk" method inside the "BadDog" class. So,\n' + |
| 61 | + 'if we execute the "walk" function with both classes ("BadDog", and "BadFish") the\n' + |
| 62 | + 'function will produce different side effects that could be break the function execution.' |
| 63 | +) |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +console.log('\nGood implementation of Liskov Substitution Principle (LCP)...') |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +interface IGoodAnimal { |
| 68 | + move(): void |
| 69 | +} |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +abstract class GoodAnimal implements IGoodAnimal { |
| 72 | + public abstract move(): void |
| 73 | +} |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +function move(animal: GoodAnimal): void { |
| 76 | + animal.move() |
| 77 | +} |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +class GoodDog extends GoodAnimal { |
| 80 | + public move(): void { |
| 81 | + console.log('Dog walking!') |
| 82 | + } |
| 83 | +} |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +class GoodFish extends GoodAnimal { |
| 86 | + public move(): void { |
| 87 | + console.log('Fish swimming!') |
| 88 | + } |
| 89 | +} |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +console.log(`\n\`\`\`\ninterface IGoodAnimal { |
| 92 | + move(): void |
| 93 | +} |
| 94 | +
|
| 95 | +abstract class GoodAnimal implements IGoodAnimal { |
| 96 | + public abstract move(): void |
| 97 | +} |
| 98 | +
|
| 99 | +function move(animal: GoodAnimal): void { |
| 100 | + animal.move() |
| 101 | +} |
| 102 | +
|
| 103 | +class GoodDog extends GoodAnimal { |
| 104 | + public move(): void { |
| 105 | + console.log('Dog walking!') |
| 106 | + } |
| 107 | +} |
| 108 | +
|
| 109 | +class GoodFish extends GoodAnimal { |
| 110 | + public move(): void { |
| 111 | + console.log('Fish swimming!') |
| 112 | + } |
| 113 | +}\n\`\`\``) |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +console.log( |
| 116 | + '\nThis is a good implementation of Liskov Substitution Principle (LCP),\n' + |
| 117 | + 'because all child classes of "GoodAnimal" class implements each method\n' + |
| 118 | + 'with the same side effect. So, if we execute the "move" function with both\n' + |
| 119 | + 'classes ("GoodDog", and "GoodFish"), we are not going to have side effects that\n' + |
| 120 | + 'could break the function execution.' |
| 121 | +) |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +console.log( |
| 124 | + '\n# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #\n' |
| 125 | +) |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +/* |
| 128 | + Additional challenge... |
| 129 | +*/ |
| 130 | + |
| 131 | +console.log('Additional challenge...') |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +interface IVehicle { |
| 134 | + brake(): void |
| 135 | + speedUp(): void |
| 136 | +} |
| 137 | + |
| 138 | +abstract class Vehicle implements IVehicle { |
| 139 | + public abstract brake(): void |
| 140 | + public abstract speedUp(): void |
| 141 | +} |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | +function brake(vehicle: Vehicle) { |
| 144 | + vehicle.brake() |
| 145 | +} |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +function speedUp(vehicle: Vehicle) { |
| 148 | + vehicle.speedUp() |
| 149 | +} |
| 150 | + |
| 151 | +class Car extends Vehicle { |
| 152 | + public brake(): void { |
| 153 | + console.log('Car braking!') |
| 154 | + } |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | + public speedUp(): void { |
| 157 | + console.log('Car speeding up!') |
| 158 | + } |
| 159 | +} |
| 160 | + |
| 161 | +class Truck extends Vehicle { |
| 162 | + public brake(): void { |
| 163 | + console.log('Truck braking!') |
| 164 | + } |
| 165 | + |
| 166 | + public speedUp(): void { |
| 167 | + console.log('Truck speeding up!') |
| 168 | + } |
| 169 | +} |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | +class Boat extends Vehicle { |
| 172 | + public brake(): void { |
| 173 | + console.log('Boat braking!') |
| 174 | + } |
| 175 | + |
| 176 | + public speedUp(): void { |
| 177 | + console.log('Boat speeding up!') |
| 178 | + } |
| 179 | +} |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +const car: Car = new Car() |
| 182 | +const truck: Truck = new Truck() |
| 183 | +const boat: Boat = new Boat() |
| 184 | + |
| 185 | +console.log() |
| 186 | +speedUp(car) |
| 187 | +speedUp(truck) |
| 188 | +speedUp(boat) |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | +console.log() |
| 191 | +brake(car) |
| 192 | +brake(truck) |
| 193 | +brake(boat) |
0 commit comments