[Enhancement]: it's not good to use table name `c$v1$xxx` directly

[hnwyllmm]

Description

It's not good to use table name c$v1$xxx directly. If we change the prefix to others, such as c$v2$xxx, we should modify all of the strings.
It's better to use CollectionNames helper interface.

[coderabbitai]

📝 CodeRabbit Plan Mode

Generate an implementation plan and prompts that you can use with your favorite coding agent.

• Create Plan

Examples

• Example 1
• Example 2

_{You can configure auto-planning by selecting labels in the issue_enrichment configuration.}

🔗 Similar Issues

Related Issues

• [Enhancement]: collection name limitation #74

👤 Suggested Assignees

• hnwyllmm

---

🧪 Issue enrichment is currently in open beta.

To disable automatic issue enrichment, add the following to your .coderabbit.yaml:

issue_enrichment:
  auto_enrich:
    enabled: false

💬 Have feedback or questions? Drop into our discord or schedule a call!

[chakkk309]

Hi @hnwyllmm . would you be open to me taking this on and refactoring the hardcoded table names to use CollectionNames?

[hnwyllmm]

@chakkk309 assigned, thanks a lot.