ITI47: omissions are not necessarily restrictions

[qligier]

In ITI-47 (PDQV3 Query), some elements (like birthPlace) are "omitted", while they are authorized (explicitly listed) in ITI-44 (PIX Feed).
CP-ITI-1293 has been filled to clarify the profile on that subject.

IPF has implemented these "omissions" as restrictions. If the CP is accepted in its current form, we can remove these restrictions.
Relevant schematron: https://github.com/oehf/ipf/blob/master/commons/ihe/hl7v3/src/main/resources/schematron/iti47/PRPA_IN201306UV02.sch.xml#L42-L49

[unixoid]

Hi Quentin
I have nothing against re-inclusion of patient demographic attributes like BirthPlace, but have a question regarding the query parameters in section 3.47.4.2.2.2, e.g. ExecutionAndDeliveryTime, SortControl, MatchWeight, etc.: Does their re-activation mean that the server (the PIX Manager) shall respect them? Is this additional functionality really desired?

[unixoid]

Status update: as of today, CP-ITI-1293 remains in the status "Assigned".