Result of doodle query for tools (Scade, EFS, WP 7 OSS, SysMl)

[BaseliyosJacob]

Dear all,

please comfirm you resources from the doodle query.
Furthermore to have more clarifications please split your resources in the WP7 OSS and SysMl Tool into
the mainparts "modelling" and "Developement" directly in the Issue Tracker:

For example:
Deutsche Bahn
Scade 550 PD - confirmed
WP 7 OSS tools Modelling 490 PD - confirmed
SysML Papyrus Modelling 370 PD - confirmed
EFS 590 PD - confirmed

[stanpinteTheSignallingCompany]

Hi Bas! Can you repost the doodle link, please?

Thanks!!

[dalzilio]

LAAS - CNRS
WP 7 OSS tools development 150 PD - confirmed

[UweSteinkeFromSiemens]

@BaseliyosJacob :

• Is "WP7 OSS Tool Modelling" a synonym for modelling with the WP 7 OSS tool chain or on the WP 7 OSS tool chain?
• Is "WP7 OSS Tool Development" a synonym for developing with using the WP 7 OSS tool chain or developing the WP 7 OSS tool chain?
• Is "SysML-Papyrus Development" a synonym for setting up the SysML part of the WP7 tool chain?

Anyhow, I can confirm our effort for modelling by using Papyrus + SCADE including the work on formalizing Subset-026, chapter 7. The distribution between these will be adjusted flexibly.

[BaseliyosJacob]

Thanks for the questions Uwe - that is a very valid questions.

Let me try to answer it from a organization view - otherwise it can become difficult to describe and find a common view on the margins.

• "WP7 OSS Tool Modelling - If the value of your effort will be a benefit for the WP 3, then please shift it
  to WP3. If the value of your effort will be a benefit for the WP 7, then please shift it to WP 7.
• "WP 7 OSS Tool Development" - If the value of your effort will be a benefit for the WP 3, then please shift it
  to WP3. If the value of your effort will be a benefit for the WP 7, then please shift it to WP 7.
• "SysML-Papyrus Development" - If the value of your effort will be a benefit for the WP 3, then please shift it
  to WP3. If the value of your effort will be a benefit for the WP 7, then please shift it to WP 7.

Since we are working in a R&D project your mention of "adjusted flexibly" is maybe the right word.

[MatthieuPERIN]

For CEA:
WP 7 OSS tools Modelling : 20 PD (support)
WP7 OSS Tools Developement : 40 PD
SysML Papyrus Modelling : 20 PD (support)
SysML Papyrus Development : 40PD

[BerndHekele]

We had some discussion on and after the PMB meeting on Friday. For clarification, I propose to include the following change in the table:

• we do not differentiate on different activities in WP7, WP7 is counted as a solid block and covers everything needed to provide a toolchain.
• I have updated the tiltes in the document accordingly. ere is the table for your confirmation (latest by next PMB):
  

[BerndHekele]

Dear Stan (@stanpinte):
the link to the doodle is:
http://doodle.com/u9vwie4xkb3tm6v28uzwqkkq/admin?#table

If you want to change your planning, please document it here as well.

Kind Regards
Bernd

[stanpinteTheSignallingCompany]

Thanks for the link!

 
Very kind regards

 
Stan

 
 
From: Bernd Hekele [mailto:notifications@github.com]
Sent: mercredi 16 octobre 2013 14:38
To: openETCS/SSRS
Cc: Stanislas Pinte
Subject: Re: [SSRS] Result of doodle query for tools (Scade, EFS, WP 7 OSS, SysMl) (#65)

 
Dear Stan (@stanpinte):
the link to the doodle is:
http://doodle.com/u9vwie4xkb3tm6v28uzwqkkq/admin?#table http://doodle.com/u9vwie4xkb3tm6v28uzwqkkq/admin?#table

If you want to change your planning, please document it here as well.

Kind Regards
Bernd

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[JanWelvaarts]

Hello Bernd,
I tried smartgit again, but I’m asked for a “master password”. Probably I try to do something illegal.
Can you give me some help by phone? (I didn’t store your phone number)
Regards,
Jan

Van: Bernd Hekele [mailto:notifications@github.com]
Verzonden: woensdag 16 oktober 2013 14:38
Aan: openETCS/SSRS
Onderwerp: Re: [SSRS] Result of doodle query for tools (Scade, EFS, WP 7 OSS, SysMl) (#65)

Dear Stan (@stanpintehttps://github.com/stanpinte):
the link to the doodle is:
http://doodle.com/u9vwie4xkb3tm6v28uzwqkkq/admin?#table

If you want to change your planning, please document it here as well.

Kind Regards
Bernd

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/65#issuecomment-26413957.

---

Lloyd’s Register is a trading name of Lloyd’s Register Group Limited and its subsidiaries. For further details please see http://www.lr.org/entities © Lloyd's Register Group Limited 2012

Lloyd's Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as 'Lloyd's Register'. Lloyd's Register assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Lloyd's Register entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.

[JonasHelming]

I have updated the doodle.

[BerndHekele]

Updated table as presented in the PMB: