Skip to content

evaluating with pretrained_imagenet gives lower J_mean and F_mean than reported in paper #27

@ruppeshnalwaya1993

Description

@ruppeshnalwaya1993

I tried evaluating using imagenet pre-trained resent50 model by removing the --resume flag and providing --pretrained-imagenet flag while running test_davis.py. I got a J_mean of 45.2 and F_mean of 48.8 which is lower than what is reported in the paper Table 1 (50.3 and 49.0). How can I reproduce these numbers?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions