Skip to content

Conversation

@Apoo711
Copy link
Owner

@Apoo711 Apoo711 commented Jun 22, 2025

Summary by Sourcery

Add a new detailed blog post on Google’s NotebookLM for VCE study, tweak the blog post list grid layout, and ensure proper file termination.

New Features:

  • Add new 'NotebookLM: Your AI-Powered Study Partner for VCE' blog post.

Enhancements:

  • Increase the minimum grid column width from 280px to 300px in the blog post list.

Chores:

  • Add missing newline at end of the first blog post file.

@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Jun 22, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

This PR ensures proper newline handling in an existing post, refines the blog list grid layout, and introduces a comprehensive new blog post on Google’s NotebookLM as a VCE study tool.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Normalize trailing newline in first post markdown
  • Added missing newline at end of file
  • Preserved existing list item formatting
src/blog/first-post.md
Adjust blog post grid layout
  • Increased minimum column width from 280px to 300px
  • Updated grid-template-columns property
src/css/components.css
Add new NotebookLM blog post
  • Created markdown file with frontmatter (title, date, tags, layout, excerpt, permalink)
  • Drafted detailed content covering introduction, features, example workflow, pros/cons, and conclusion
  • Embedded illustrative images and section headings
src/blog/notebooklm.md

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@Apoo711 Apoo711 merged commit 8be847c into main Jun 22, 2025
0 of 2 checks passed
@Apoo711 Apoo711 deleted the research branch June 22, 2025 07:27
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @Apoo711 - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants