Skip to content

Conversation

@jamesrhester
Copy link
Contributor

Now that imgCIF has been updated to conform to DDLm style we can return it to the checking workflow. As well as returning imgCIF to the workflow, the present PR: corrects dates; fixes two types that did not match imgCIF; and fixes the imgCIF head category name.

The one remaining error should be the single imgCIF data name that uses _esd in a SU data name, as do all such mmCIF data names.

@vaitkus
Copy link
Collaborator

vaitkus commented Sep 17, 2025

Merging PR COMCIFS/dictionary_check_action#17 should suppress the esd data name issue. However, additional formal validation messages will should now also appear due to the ddlm_validate script being run instead of short circuiting on first failure.

Copy link
Collaborator

@vaitkus vaitkus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Thank you!

@vaitkus vaitkus linked an issue Sep 23, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@jamesrhester jamesrhester merged commit bc92c8d into COMCIFS:master Sep 23, 2025
3 checks passed
@jamesrhester jamesrhester deleted the test_imgcif_workflow branch September 23, 2025 12:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Resolve validation issues caused by imgCIF

2 participants