Skip to content

Conversation

@kasuncfdo
Copy link

@kasuncfdo kasuncfdo commented Dec 6, 2025

PR Type

Documentation


Description

  • Enhanced README header with centered logo and tagline

  • Updated website URL from ceylabs.com to ceylabs.io

  • Added consistent spacing between sections for readability


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["README.md"] -->|Add centered logo| B["Visual header"]
  A -->|Update URL| C["ceylabs.io"]
  A -->|Improve formatting| D["Section spacing"]
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Documentation
README.md
Add logo header and improve README formatting                       

README.md

  • Added centered HTML header with CeyLabs logo and tagline "Where
    Blockchain Meets Community"
  • Updated website URL from ceylabs.com to ceylabs.io in Contact Us
    section
  • Added blank lines between major sections for improved readability and
    visual hierarchy
  • Maintained all existing content while enhancing presentation and
    formatting
+20/-2   

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated project docs: added centered branding, expanded service offerings (Cloud, UI/UX, Consultancy), and enriched guidelines for app types, branching, deployment, contributing, and contact details.
  • Chores
    • Added a simple last-updated timestamp file to track the repository update time.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@kasuncfdo kasuncfdo requested a review from cmnisal December 6, 2025 22:19
@kasuncfdo kasuncfdo self-assigned this Dec 6, 2025
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 6, 2025 22:19
@kasuncfdo kasuncfdo added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 6, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2025

Walkthrough

Updates to documentation: README.md receives expanded content and HTML branding; a new timestamp.txt file is added recording the last update. No code or public API changes are included.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation
README.md
Added centered HTML branding; expanded service offerings (Cloud Solutions, UI/UX Design, Consultancy); broadened repository guidelines (app types, branching, deployment); expanded Production Deployment, Contributing, and Contact Us sections.
Metadata
timestamp.txt
New file created with a single line recording last update time: Last updated: Sat Dec 6 22:28:44 UTC 2025.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Review items: verify README content/formatting and confirm timestamp value.

Poem

🐇 I hopped in to polish lines so bright,
README dressed in banners, bold and light,
Services grew and guidance grew clear,
A tiny timestamp whispers: "I'm here."
Hooray — the repo hops along with cheer!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'feat: update readme intro and web' accurately describes the main changes: adding a centered HTML header with branding to the README introduction and updating the website URL.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch kasun/readme-update

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ebd7c25 and 3f5caf3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md (3 hunks)
  • timestamp.txt (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • timestamp.txt
🔇 Additional comments (4)
README.md (4)

1-9: Previous issues resolved; HTML structure now properly closed.

The nested <p> tags and hard tab issues flagged in prior reviews appear to be addressed in this commit. The HTML structure is now valid with no redundant nesting.


1-62: Inconsistency between AI summary and provided files.

The AI summary references an added timestamp.txt file with the content "Last updated: Sat Dec 6 22:28:44 UTC 2025", but this file is not included in the provided files for review. Please clarify whether this file is part of the PR scope.


8-8: Website URL successfully updated to ceylabs.io.

Both the link in the header (line 8) and the Contact Us section (line 61) correctly reference the new domain ceylabs.io as stated in the PR objectives.

Also applies to: 61-61


11-62: Content organization and structure look solid.

The README has been expanded with:

  • Clearer service descriptions (lines 17–22 now include Cloud Solutions, UI/UX Design, and Consultancy)
  • Detailed repository guidelines with app type definitions and branching strategy
  • Improved section spacing and visual hierarchy
  • Enhanced deployment and contribution guidance

All changes are documentation-only and align with the PR objectives.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@qodo-code-review
Copy link

qodo-code-review bot commented Dec 6, 2025

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🎫 No ticket provided
  • Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
Codebase context is not defined

Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.

Custom Compliance
🟢
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails

Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code

Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management

Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Error Handling

Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Logging Practices

Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling

Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

  • Update
Compliance status legend 🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the README to include a new header with the CeyLabs logo and tagline, corrects the website URL, and adds the timestamp file and logo asset. The changes enhance the visual presentation and ensure accurate contact information.

  • Added centered header with logo and tagline
  • Corrected website URL from ceylabs.com to ceylabs.io
  • Added timestamp tracking file

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
timestamp.txt Added timestamp file tracking the last update
profile/assets/CeyLabs LLC.svg Added CeyLabs logo as SVG asset
README.md Updated header section with logo, corrected website URL, and improved formatting

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@qodo-code-review
Copy link

qodo-code-review bot commented Dec 6, 2025

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
High-level
Use an absolute URL for the logo

The logo's relative path in the new header is unreliable. To prevent broken
images and ensure consistent branding, it should be replaced with an absolute
URL pointing to the raw image file.

Examples:

README.md [3]
   <img width="150" height="150" src="profile/assets/CeyLabs LLC.svg" alt="Logo">

Solution Walkthrough:

Before:

<p align="center">
  <p align="center">
   <img width="150" height="150" src="profile/assets/CeyLabs LLC.svg" alt="Logo">
  </p>
	<h1 align="center"><b>CeyLabs</b></h1>
	<p align="center">
		Where Blockchain Meets Community.
    <br />
    <a href="https://ceylabs.io"><strong>CeyLabs.io »</strong></a>
  </p>
</p>

After:

<p align="center">
  <p align="center">
   <img width="150" height="150" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CeyLabs/.github/main/profile/assets/CeyLabs%20LLC.svg" alt="Logo">
  </p>
	<h1 align="center"><b>CeyLabs</b></h1>
	<p align="center">
		Where Blockchain Meets Community.
    <br />
    <a href="https://ceylabs.io"><strong>CeyLabs.io »</strong></a>
  </p>
</p>
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

__

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that a relative image path can break when the README is viewed in different contexts, which would defeat the PR's goal of enhancing the profile's visual presentation.

Medium
General
Fix invalid HTML structure for compatibility
Suggestion Impact:The commit partially addressed the invalid HTML by removing the nested

around the image and separating the header elements, reducing invalid nesting. However, it did not switch to a

container nor remove the tag from the

.

code diff:

@@ -1,14 +1,12 @@
 <p align="center">
+   <img width="150" height="150" src="profile/assets/CeyLabs LLC.svg" alt="Logo">
+</p>
+  <h1 align="center"><b>CeyLabs</b></h1>
   <p align="center">
-   <img width="150" height="150" src="profile/assets/CeyLabs LLC.svg" alt="Logo">
-  </p>
-	<h1 align="center"><b>CeyLabs</b></h1>
-	<p align="center">
-		Where Blockchain Meets Community.
+    Where Blockchain Meets Community.
     <br />
     <a href="https://ceylabs.io"><strong>CeyLabs.io »</strong></a>
   </p>
-</p>


Refactor the HTML header to use a

container instead of nested

tags and remove
the redundant tag from the

to create valid and semantically correct HTML.

README.md [1-11]

-<p align="center">
-  <p align="center">
-   <img width="150" height="150" src="profile/assets/CeyLabs LLC.svg" alt="Logo">
-  </p>
-	<h1 align="center"><b>CeyLabs</b></h1>
-	<p align="center">
-		Where Blockchain Meets Community.
+<div align="center">
+  <img width="150" height="150" src="profile/assets/CeyLabs LLC.svg" alt="Logo">
+  <h1>CeyLabs</h1>
+  <p>
+    Where Blockchain Meets Community.
     <br />
     <a href="https://ceylabs.io"><strong>CeyLabs.io »</strong></a>
   </p>
-</p>
+</div>

[Suggestion processed]

Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

__

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies invalid HTML structure (nested <p> tags and a block-level <h1> within a <p>) and provides a valid fix using a <div>, which improves semantic correctness and rendering consistency.

Medium
  • Update

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
timestamp.txt (1)

1-1: Consider removing the timestamp.txt file or automate its generation.

Static timestamp files become stale immediately after any commit and require manual maintenance to remain accurate. Since git metadata already tracks commit timestamps, this file introduces redundancy and maintenance overhead.

If tracking last-update times is important, consider:

  • Using a build/CI pipeline to generate this file automatically
  • Referencing git commit metadata instead
  • Removing it entirely if not actively used
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec1dcf8 and ebd7c25.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • profile/assets/CeyLabs LLC.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • profile/assets/CeyLabs LLC.svg is excluded by !**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md (3 hunks)
  • timestamp.txt (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md

5-5: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


6-6: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


7-7: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

13-63: Content and structure look good.

The README updates are well-organized and comprehensive. The company description, expanded service offerings, detailed repository guidelines, and contributing instructions provide clear direction for developers. The website link in the Contact Us section is current.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 6, 2025 22:28
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request Review effort 1/5

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants