Skip to content

Conversation

@astuyve
Copy link
Contributor

@astuyve astuyve commented Feb 15, 2024

  • feat: Aspect POC
  • feat: Add datadog aspect
  • feat: No need to forward logs, addFunctions will do that
  • docs: Document Aspects in readme

What does this PR do?

Allows our construct to be imported and used as an Aspect, which makes it easier to instrument all functions in a stack without re-importing or re-declaring the Datadog construct.

Motivation

Testing Guidelines

Additional Notes

Types of Changes

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Breaking change
  • Misc (docs, refactoring, dependency upgrade, etc.)

Check all that apply

  • This PR's description is comprehensive
  • This PR contains breaking changes that are documented in the description
  • This PR introduces new APIs or parameters that are documented and unlikely to change in the foreseeable future
  • This PR impacts documentation, and it has been updated (or a ticket has been logged)
  • This PR's changes are covered by the automated tests
  • This PR collects user input/sensitive content into Datadog

@astuyve astuyve requested review from a team as code owners February 15, 2024 16:42
constructor(private datadog: Datadog) {}

visit(node: IConstruct): void {
if (node.constructor.name === lambda.Function.name) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems that this condition might not instrument lambda.SingletonFunction, is this intentional?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah that's a miss, good call

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the interfaces differ, so LambdaFunction.name might or might not work 🤔

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's what I seemed to run into.

Copy link
Contributor

@duncanista duncanista left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM – thanks a lot for this PR, AJ! 🎉

@astuyve
Copy link
Contributor Author

astuyve commented Feb 16, 2024

holding off on merging this because apparently this issue still remains.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants