Adapt to pixi-devenv 0.1.0

[nicoddemus]

Initially we envisioned pixi.devenv.toml files dependencies to be included as:

includes = ["../core"]

However, in the end we went with a different syntax:

[devenv]
upstream = ["../core"]

[prusse-martin]

I really like to avoid those conditionals (case ... if ...:) in match/case constructs =)

>>> def what_is(v):
...   match v:
...     case [*a]:
...       print(f'{a=}')
...     case set(b):
...       print(f'{b=}')
...     case c:
...       print(f'{c=}')
...
>>> what_is([1,2,3])
a=[1, 2, 3]
>>> what_is((1,2,3))
a=[1, 2, 3]
>>> what_is({1,2,3})
b={1, 2, 3}
>>> what_is({1:11,2:22,3:33})
c={1: 11, 2: 22, 3: 33}
>>> what_is([])
a=[]

Suggested change

	match data:
	case {"devenv": {"upstream": upstream}} if upstream:
	return [
	Path(os.path.abspath(dev_env_file.parent / get_relative_path(p)))
	/ "pixi.devenv.toml"
	for p in upstream
	]
	case _:
	return []
	match data:
	case {"devenv": {"upstream": [*upstream]}}:
	return [
	Path(os.path.abspath(dev_env_file.parent / get_relative_path(p)))
	/ "pixi.devenv.toml"
	for p in upstream
	]
	case _:
	return []

Looks better to me.
And what if that upstream is bound to some other thing like a string?

[prusse-martin]

Maybe it could even be

Suggested change

	match data:
	case {"devenv": {"upstream": upstream}} if upstream:
	return [
	Path(os.path.abspath(dev_env_file.parent / get_relative_path(p)))
	/ "pixi.devenv.toml"
	for p in upstream
	]
	case _:
	return []
	match data:
	case {"devenv": {"upstream": [*upstream]}}:
	return [
	(dev_env_file.parent / get_relative_path(p)).absolute()
	/ "pixi.devenv.toml"
	for p in upstream
	]
	case {"devenv": {"upstream": invalid_upstream}}:
	raise RuntimeError(
	f'Invalid upstream declaration: {invalid_upstream!r}\nThe expected value should be a list.'
	)
	case _:
	return []

or even

Maybe it could even be

Suggested change

	match data:
	case {"devenv": {"upstream": upstream}} if upstream:
	return [
	Path(os.path.abspath(dev_env_file.parent / get_relative_path(p)))
	/ "pixi.devenv.toml"
	for p in upstream
	]
	case _:
	return []
	match data:
	case {"devenv": {"upstream": [*upstream]}}:
	return [
	(dev_env_file.parent / get_relative_path(p)).absolute()
	/ "pixi.devenv.toml"
	for p in upstream
	]
	case {"devenv": {"upstream": str(upstream)}}:
	return [
	(
	dev_env_file.parent / get_relative_path(upstream)
	).absolute() / "pixi.devenv.toml"
	]
	case {"devenv": {"upstream": invalid_upstream}}:
	raise RuntimeError(
	f'Invalid upstream declaration: {invalid_upstream!r}\nThe expected value should be a list.'
	)
	case _:
	return []

[nicoddemus]

I think this is a matter of taste, and TBH my version looks better to me, so I will keep my version if you don't mind.