Skip to content

Conversation

@mathomp4
Copy link
Member

This tracks changes needed for GEOSadas-5.29.5-p6 on SLES 15.

PRs in other repos (all on the feature/mathomp4/GEOSadas-5.29.5-SLES15 branch):


To build on Cas SLES15 you can do:

./parallel_build.csh -cas15

@mathomp4 mathomp4 added 0 diff The changes in this pull request have verified to be zero-diff with the target branch. Non 0-diff The changes in this pull request are non-zero-diff labels Jan 24, 2025
@mathomp4 mathomp4 self-assigned this Jan 24, 2025
@rtodling
Copy link
Collaborator

rtodling commented Mar 4, 2025

Pls the latest patch of GEOS-FP is p7 not p6 ...

@mathomp4
Copy link
Member Author

Pls the latest patch of GEOS-FP is p7 not p6 ...

@rtodling I think at the time it was p6. Should I redo this PR for p7?

@rtodling rtodling marked this pull request as ready for review March 10, 2025 17:12
@rtodling rtodling requested a review from a team as a code owner March 10, 2025 17:12
@rtodling
Copy link
Collaborator

rtodling commented Mar 10, 2025

@mathomp4 I absorbed these and more into another set of changes I am aiming at the GEOS-FP protected branch. We could ... so not to bypass your work, I have changed the target of you changes here to the GEOS-FP branch.

OOPS: I just realized I can do that - so I reversed back - the release you started from is behind the latest patch 7 of FP. I talked to Rob about this last week. So I will fold my changes over yours.

@rtodling rtodling changed the base branch from release/5.29.5-p6-SLES15 to GEOS-FP March 10, 2025 17:15
@rtodling rtodling changed the base branch from GEOS-FP to release/5.29.5-p6-SLES15 March 10, 2025 17:16
@rtodling rtodling merged commit 316666c into release/5.29.5-p6-SLES15 Mar 10, 2025
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

0 diff The changes in this pull request have verified to be zero-diff with the target branch. Non 0-diff The changes in this pull request are non-zero-diff

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants