fix: docker makefile recipies and pre-commit configuration

[efcaguab]

• Improve dependencies of docker recopies in Makefile (prevents need to manually create volume)
• Fix pre-commit dependencies to include codespell

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR improves the Makefile and pre-commit configuration by automating docker volume creation and fixing codespell dependencies. The changes make docker-based workflows more robust by automatically creating required external volumes, and ensure codespell is properly available in pre-commit hooks. Additionally, the Makefile is refactored to use centralized PYTHON and PIP variables for better maintainability.

Key Changes:

• Added docker-volume as a prerequisite to docker-related targets to automatically create the external GCP volume
• Introduced PYTHON and PIP variables to centralize Python command invocations throughout the Makefile
• Added codespell[toml]>=2.4 to pre-commit hook's additional_dependencies

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File	Description
Makefile	Added PYTHON/PIP variables, made docker targets depend on docker-volume, standardized Python command usage
.pre-commit-config.yaml	Added codespell[toml]>=2.4 to additional_dependencies for the codespell hook

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[tomaslink]

I don't believe this should be here. The idea of this command is to execute the unit tests in isolation against the installed package in a docker container. This is used in the CI/CD. Why would you need the volume with authentication information?

I would say the same for reqs and reqs-upgrade.

It could be useful in docker-shell if you didn't run docker-gcp before.

[efcaguab]

I added these pre-reqs because reqs and reqs upgrade would fail without creating the volume first. But you're right that we should't really need a volume with credentials to do these things.

Perhaps the real fix is adding a separate dev service in the docker compose that doesn't need GCP? Or just remove the mount from the dev service if nothing else needs it?

[tomaslink]

@efcaguab Oh I see. Yes, I think the correct solution is to add a separate service for the requirements:

  req:
    build:
      context: .
      target: dev
    volumes:
      - ".:/opt/project"
    entrypoint: /bin/bash

I think we need a dev service with the volume because some people use the docker container to develop (I don't...).