Skip to content

Conversation

@bhandarivijay-png
Copy link
Contributor

Automated: Migrate {target_path} from gsutil to gcloud storage

This CL is part of the on going effort to migrate from the legacy gsutil tool to the new and improved gcloud storage command-line interface.
gcloud storage is the recommended and modern tool for interacting with Google Cloud Storage, offering better performance, unified authentication, and a more consistent command structure with other gcloud components. 🚀

Automation Details

This change was generated automatically by an agent that targets users of gsutil.
The transformations applied are based on the gsutil to gcloud storage migration guide.

⚠️ Action Required: Please Review and Test Carefully

While we have based the automation on the migration guide, every use case is unique.
It is crucial that you thoroughly test these changes in environments appropriate to your use-case before merging.
Be aware of potential differences between gsutil and gcloud storage that could impact your workflows.
For instance, the structure of command output may have changed, requiring updates to any scripts that parse it. Similarly, command behavior can differ subtly; the gcloud storage rsync command has a different file deletion logic than gsutil rsync, which could lead to unintended file deletions.

Our migration guides can help guide you through a list of mappings and some notable differences between the two tools.

Standard presubmit tests are run as part of this CL's workflow. If you need to target an additional test workflow or require assistance with testing, please let us know.

Please verify that all your Cloud Storage operations continue to work as expected to avoid any potential disruptions in production.

Support and Collaboration

The GCS CLI team is here to help! If you encounter any issues, have a complex use case that this automated change doesn't cover, or face any other blockers, please don't hesitate to reach out.
We are happy to work with you to test and adjust these changes as needed.

Contact: gcs-cli-hyd@google.com

We appreciate your partnership in this important migration effort!

#gsutil-migration

@bhandarivijay-png bhandarivijay-png requested review from a team as code owners December 24, 2025 17:47
@bhandarivijay-png
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @glasnt, Can we get your review on this PR? Thanks!

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added api: run Issues related to the GoogleCloudPlatform/cloud-run-samples API. samples Issues that are directly related to samples. labels Dec 24, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @bhandarivijay-png, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the codebase to utilize the gcloud storage command-line interface instead of the deprecated gsutil tool for Google Cloud Storage operations. This migration is an automated effort to standardize and improve interactions with Cloud Storage, offering better performance and unified authentication. It is crucial for reviewers to carefully test these changes to ensure no regressions occur due to potential behavioral differences between the two tools.

Highlights

  • Migration to gcloud storage: This pull request migrates existing gsutil commands to the modern gcloud storage command-line interface, aligning with Google's recommended practices for interacting with Google Cloud Storage.
  • Automated Change: The changes in this PR were automatically generated by an agent as part of an ongoing effort to transition from the legacy gsutil tool.
  • Thorough Testing Required: Reviewers are urged to thoroughly test these changes in their environments, as gcloud storage may have subtle behavioral differences (e.g., rsync deletion logic, command output structure) compared to gsutil.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request automates the migration from gsutil to gcloud storage. The changes across the files correctly replace gsutil commands with their gcloud storage equivalents. The migration also introduces an improvement by enabling in-flight compression when uploading the report, which is a good practice. I have one suggestion to improve the robustness of the shell script by ensuring non-interactive execution, mirroring the behavior of the original gsutil command.

gcloud run services list \
--format "${format}" \
--filter "metadata.name~${search}" | gsutil -q cp -J - "${obj}"
--filter "metadata.name~${search}" | gcloud storage cp --gzip-in-flight-all - "${obj}"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The original gsutil command used the -q (quiet) flag to suppress interactive prompts and progress indicators, which is a best practice for scripts. The gcloud equivalent is the global --quiet flag. It's recommended to add this to the gcloud storage cp command to ensure the script runs non-interactively and its output remains clean.

Suggested change
--filter "metadata.name~${search}" | gcloud storage cp --gzip-in-flight-all - "${obj}"
--filter "metadata.name~${search}" | gcloud --quiet storage cp --gzip-in-flight-all - "${obj}"

@glasnt glasnt changed the title Migrate gsutil usage to gcloud storage chore(gcloud-report): migrate gsutil usage to gcloud storage Jan 4, 2026
@glasnt
Copy link
Contributor

glasnt commented Jan 4, 2026

/gcbrun

@glasnt glasnt merged commit 5e26f9a into GoogleCloudPlatform:main Jan 5, 2026
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: run Issues related to the GoogleCloudPlatform/cloud-run-samples API. samples Issues that are directly related to samples.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants