Skip to content

Conversation

@xSAVIKx
Copy link

@xSAVIKx xSAVIKx commented Dec 23, 2025

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Node.js version upgraded from 20 to 24 across development environment, CI workflows, and dependencies. GitHub Actions updated in workflows. Multiple npm dependencies upgraded to align with the new Node.js version and latest releases.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Development & Action Configuration
.devcontainer/devcontainer.json, action.yml
Devcontainer image updated from Node 20 to 24; GitHub Action runtime changed from node20 to node24.
CI/CD Workflow
.github/workflows/ci.yml
GitHub Actions versions upgraded: checkout@v4→v5, setup-node@v4→v6; Node.js version bumped from 20.18.3 to 24.11.1 across all three jobs (create, update, destroy).
Dependency Management
package.json
Node engine requirement changed from >=20 to >=24; runtime dependencies upgraded (@actions/core ^1.10.1→^2.0.1, @actions/exec ^1.1.1→^2.0.0, @octokit/rest ^21.0.1→^22.0.1, pathe ^1.1.2→^2.0.3, wgc ^0.75.6→^0.102.6, and others); devDependencies including @types/node, @vercel/ncc, prettier, and prettier-eslint updated.
Documentation
README.md
Updated to reflect CI workflow and Node.js version changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No pull request description was provided by the author, making it impossible to evaluate relevance to the changeset. Add a pull request description explaining the rationale for upgrading to Node.js 24, any breaking changes, and testing performed.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Update setup to node24' directly describes the main change across multiple files: upgrading Node.js from version 20 to 24 in devcontainer, GitHub Actions workflows, action.yml, and package.json.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch migrate-to-latest-node

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@xSAVIKx xSAVIKx merged commit 0165f4a into main Dec 23, 2025
2 of 4 checks passed
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)

39-39: Typo: Extra space in secrets reference.

There's a space between secrets. and GITHUB_TOKEN which will cause the workflow to fail with an invalid expression error.

🔎 Proposed fix
-          github_token: ${{ secrets. GITHUB_TOKEN }}
+          github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

70-70: Typo: Extra space in secrets reference.

Same issue as in the create job - the space will break the expression parsing.

🔎 Proposed fix
-          github_token: ${{ secrets. GITHUB_TOKEN }}
+          github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 70a7804 and 574ccbe.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .devcontainer/devcontainer.json
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml
  • README.md
  • action.yml
  • package.json
🔇 Additional comments (7)
package.json (3)

15-17: LGTM!

The engine constraint update to >=24 is consistent with the Node.js version used in CI workflows, devcontainer, and action runtime.


73-73: @types/node@24 is available and provides accurate typings for Node 24.

The version is published on npm and aligns with Node.js 24 API surface. This follows the recommended practice of matching the @types/node major version to your Node.js major version.


59-66: No breaking API compatibility issues detected with major version upgrades.

The upgraded libraries are used in ways that remain compatible:

  • @actions/core (v2.0.1): Uses setFailed(), exportVariable(), info(), and setOutput() — all unchanged from v1
  • @actions/exec (v2.0.0): Uses exec.exec() — signature unchanged from v1
  • @actions/github (v6.0.1): Uses github.context and github.getOctokit() — both stable APIs
  • @octokit/rest (v22.0.1): Imported only as types (RestEndpointMethodTypes), no runtime breaking changes
  • pathe (v2.0.3): Not imported or used anywhere in the source code
  • wgc (v0.102.6): Used via type imports and CLI commands (exec.exec()), not affected by API surface changes

The codebase is compatible with these dependency upgrades.

README.md (2)

83-88: LGTM!

Documentation updated consistently with the CI workflow changes. The example workflow correctly reflects the new action versions and Node.js version.


107-112: LGTM!

Update and destroy job examples are consistent with the create job updates.

Also applies to: 131-136

.devcontainer/devcontainer.json (1)

3-3: The typescript-node:24 image is available in MCR.

The update to typescript-node:24 is confirmed and aligns with the Node 24 migration.

action.yml (1)

36-36: node24 runtime is supported and this upgrade is correct.

GitHub Actions officially supports node24 as a JavaScript action runtime. The change aligns with GitHub's roadmap, which plans to make Node 24 the default for runners on March 4, 2026.

Comment on lines +19 to +25
uses: actions/checkout@v5

- name: Setup Node.js
id: setup-node
uses: actions/setup-node@v4
uses: actions/setup-node@v6
with:
node-version: 20.18.3
node-version: 24.11.1
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

cd /tmp && git ls-files | grep -E "\.github/workflows" | head -20

Repository: GuideToIceland/cosmo-previews

Length of output: 141


🏁 Script executed:

cat -n .github/workflows/ci.yml 2>/dev/null || echo "File not found at expected location"

Repository: GuideToIceland/cosmo-previews

Length of output: 3589


🌐 Web query:

actions/checkout@v5 github actions latest version 2025

💡 Result:

The latest actions/checkout v5 release is v5.0.1 (released Nov 17, 2025). [1][2]

Sources:
[1] GitHub releases for actions/checkout.
[2] GitHub Marketplace Checkout action (v5 notes).


🌐 Web query:

actions/setup-node@v6 github actions latest version 2025

💡 Result:

Latest v6 tag: actions/setup-node@v6.1.0 — released Dec 3, 2025. [1][2]

Sources:
[1] actions/setup-node releases (v6.1.0).
[2] actions/setup-node repository (v6 docs).


🌐 Web query:

Node.js version 24.11.1 release

💡 Result:

Node.js v24.11.1 was released on November 11, 2025 (branch v24 "Krypton"). npm bundled: v11.6.2; V8: v13.6.233.10. Download and release notes are on the Node.js archive and the GitHub releases page. [1][2]

Sources:
[1] Node.js download archive — v24.11.1.
[2] nodejs/node GitHub releases — v24.11.1.


Fix syntax error in GitHub Actions secrets access.

The GitHub Actions versions (actions/checkout@v5 and actions/setup-node@v6) and Node.js version 24.11.1 are all valid and current. However, lines 39 and 70 contain a syntax error: ${{ secrets. GITHUB_TOKEN }} has an unwanted space after secrets. that will cause workflow failures. Update to ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} to match the correct syntax on line 100.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/ci.yml around lines 19-25 (and also check lines 39 and 70
where the issue occurs): there's a syntax error in GitHub Actions secrets access
where `${{ secrets. GITHUB_TOKEN }}` includes an extra space after `secrets.`;
replace those instances with `${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}` (and scan the file
for any other `secrets.` usages with stray spaces and correct them to remove the
space).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants