Skip to content

Conversation

@RafalOzogJudopay
Copy link
Contributor

@RafalOzogJudopay RafalOzogJudopay commented Nov 26, 2025

What is it doing: Solves problem of unequal inputs height on error. After research and playing around with flows and xml, I think that the most reliable solution is to take out horizontally-paired inputs out of the 'flows', and position them using simpler containers (LinearLayout).
It has been tested, and seems to work well both in CardEntry and BillingDetails screens.

Demo:

Before:
before.webm

After:
After.webm

@RafalOzogJudopay RafalOzogJudopay force-pushed the CT-3128-inputs-consistent-height-on-error branch from c2a809e to 2114b1d Compare November 26, 2025 15:32
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
9 Security Hotspots
10.7% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)
C Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)
C Security Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants