Skip to content

Conversation

@negvet
Copy link
Collaborator

@negvet negvet commented Dec 16, 2025

Description

Please include a brief summary of the changes, relevant motivation and context.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Documentation change (change only to the documentation, either a fix or a new content)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Infra/Build change
  • Code refactoring

Changes

Please list the changes introduced in this PR:

  • Change A
  • Change B

Checklist:

  • I have read and followed the contributing guidelines
  • The functionality is complete
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

Signed-off-by: Evgeny <etsykunov@nvidia.com>
@negvet negvet added the fp4 label Dec 16, 2025
@negvet
Copy link
Collaborator Author

negvet commented Dec 16, 2025

/te-ci

@zhongbozhu
Copy link
Collaborator

Having a separate amax scale API automatically means that we need a grouped API for MOE and therefore not a good choice moving forward. Can we fuse the amax scaling as part of the FP4 quantize kernels via the quantization config struct? Whenever we change the numeric for Dense, we have to change it for MOE.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants