Skip to content

Conversation

@VeeraRajasekhar
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Please include a brief summary of the changes, relevant motivation and context.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Documentation change (change only to the documentation, either a fix or a new content)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Infra/Build change
  • Code refactoring

Changes

Please list the changes introduced in this PR:

  • Change A
  • Change B

Checklist:

  • I have read and followed the contributing guidelines
  • The functionality is complete
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

tests/pytorch/test_fused_optimizer.py: relax fp8 exp_avg tolerance on HIP gfx950

tests/pytorch/test_fusible_ops.py: skip fp8 quantized GEMM cases lacking hipBLASLt algos on gfx950

tests/pytorch/test_numerics.py: skip tests on gfx950 with missing hipBLASLt algo

transformer_engine/pytorch/triton_kernels/rmsnorm.py: guard pointer alignment hints based on runtime alignment in fwd/bwd
@VeeraRajasekhar VeeraRajasekhar changed the title Veergopu gfx950 ci release v2.2 gfx950 ci release v2.2 Jan 16, 2026
@ipanfilo
Copy link
Collaborator

TE 2.2 is already released and should not accept any new commits

@VeeraRajasekhar
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmm, Do we have anyother way? cause to enable we need the gfx950 fix & to be able to run on CI, we need the rocm-ci.yml file.

@wenchenvincent any comments on this?

@ipanfilo
Copy link
Collaborator

mmm, Do we have anyother way? cause to enable we need the gfx950 fix & to be able to run on CI, we need the rocm-ci.yml file.

@wenchenvincent any comments on this?

The first question is why do we need enable GFX950 CI on closed branch?

@VeeraRajasekhar
Copy link
Contributor Author

No longer needed as branch is tagged and closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants