-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
【修正】修改ppp_netdev_add中先使用ppp_device->pppif.name,后才赋值的问题 #33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughReordered the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
src/ppp_device.c (1)
381-387: Update the error message to reflect the actual operation.The error message references "pppapi_set_default execute failed" but this block checks the result of
ppp_netdev_add(or previously an unrelated operation). The message should accurately describe the failure.📝 Proposed fix
if (result != RT_EOK) { - LOG_E("pppapi_set_default execute failed."); + LOG_E("ppp_netdev_add failed."); result = -RT_ERROR; goto __exit; } - LOG_D("pppapi_set_default has set a default route."); + LOG_D("ppp netdev registered successfully.");
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @src/ppp_device.c:
- Line 379: ppp_netdev_add's return value must be captured and checked so
failures don't go unnoticed; modify the call where
ppp_netdev_add(&ppp_device->pppif) is invoked to store the returned int, test
for non-zero/failure, log a descriptive error (including the returned
errno/code) and perform appropriate cleanup/return (e.g., free ppp_device, undo
prior allocations, or goto an error label) instead of proceeding as if
registration succeeded.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/ppp_device.c
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
src/ppp_device.c (1)
src/ppp_netif.c (1)
ppp_netdev_add(31-76)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/ppp_device.c (1)
374-380: Excellent fix for use-before-initialization bug!The reordering correctly ensures
ppp_device->pppif.nameis assigned (lines 376-377) beforeppp_netdev_addreads it. Previously,ppp_netdev_addwould have read uninitialized memory since it callsrt_strncpy(name, ppp_netif->name, LWIP_NETIF_NAME_LEN)internally.
| ppp_device->pppif.name[0] = ppp_device->parent.parent.name[0]; | ||
| ppp_device->pppif.name[1] = ppp_device->parent.parent.name[1]; | ||
|
|
||
| ppp_netdev_add(&ppp_device->pppif); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Capture and check the return value of ppp_netdev_add.
The return value of ppp_netdev_add is not being captured or checked. If registration fails, the function continues without detecting the error.
🔧 Proposed fix
- ppp_netdev_add(&ppp_device->pppif);
+ result = ppp_netdev_add(&ppp_device->pppif);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ppp_netdev_add(&ppp_device->pppif); | |
| result = ppp_netdev_add(&ppp_device->pppif); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @src/ppp_device.c at line 379, ppp_netdev_add's return value must be captured
and checked so failures don't go unnoticed; modify the call where
ppp_netdev_add(&ppp_device->pppif) is invoked to store the returned int, test
for non-zero/failure, log a descriptive error (including the returned
errno/code) and perform appropriate cleanup/return (e.g., free ppp_device, undo
prior allocations, or goto an error label) instead of proceeding as if
registration succeeded.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/ppp_device.c (1)
379-379: Consider checking the return value ofppp_netdev_add().The function
ppp_netdev_add()can fail if memory allocation for the netdev structure fails (returns-ERR_IF) or ifnetdev_register()fails. While the PPP connection might still function at the protocol level, netdev subsystem integration would be incomplete.♻️ Proposed error handling
- ppp_netdev_add(&ppp_device->pppif); + result = ppp_netdev_add(&ppp_device->pppif); + if (result != RT_EOK) + { + LOG_W("ppp_netdev_add failed, netdev integration unavailable."); + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/ppp_device.c
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
src/ppp_device.c (1)
src/ppp_netif.c (1)
ppp_netdev_add(31-76)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/ppp_device.c (1)
374-377: LGTM! Use-before-assign issue correctly fixed.The network interface name is now assigned before calling
ppp_netdev_add(), which prevents the use-before-assign bug. The functionppp_netdev_add()readsppp_netif->name(line 54 inppp_netif.c), so this ordering is essential.
修改ppp_netdev_add中先使用ppp_device->pppif.name,后才赋值的问题
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.