Skip to content

Conversation

@VeskeR
Copy link
Contributor

@VeskeR VeskeR commented Mar 4, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the release notes with details for version v2.0.11, including links for further comparison with the previous release.
  • Chores
    • Incremented the library version to v2.0.11.
    • Addressed an issue related to websockets support.

@VeskeR VeskeR requested review from sacOO7 and ttypic March 4, 2025 14:18
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to staging/pull/594/features March 4, 2025 14:19 Inactive
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 4, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the version number across documentation and package metadata. A new changelog entry for version v2.0.11 is added in CHANGELOG.md with GitHub links and a reference to closed issue #591 regarding websockets version 13. The version string is updated from v2.0.10 to v2.0.11 in both ably/__init__.py and pyproject.toml. No changes in functionality or public API are introduced.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Added new v2.0.11 entry with GitHub links and a reference to closed issue #591 regarding websockets v13; v2.0.10 entry remains unchanged.
ably/init.py, pyproject.toml Updated version from v2.0.10 to v2.0.11.

Possibly related PRs

  • Release 2.0.10 #589: Involved version updates in CHANGELOG.md, ably/__init__.py, and pyproject.toml from v2.0.10 to v2.0.11.
  • Release/2.0.7 #572: Focused on similar file updates for a previous version increment from v2.0.6 to v2.0.7.

Suggested reviewers

  • ttypic
  • sacOO7

Poem

Hop, skip, and code away,
I, a rabbit, dance today.
A new version hops in with delight,
Bumping numbers day and night.
Cheers to updates in every byte!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b439046 and 8372924.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • ably/__init__.py (1 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • pyproject.toml
  • ably/init.py
  • CHANGELOG.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: check (3.13)
  • GitHub Check: check (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: check (3.11)
  • GitHub Check: check (3.10)
  • GitHub Check: check (3.9)
  • GitHub Check: check (3.8)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Collaborator

@sacOO7 sacOO7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@VeskeR VeskeR merged commit 95fcb6e into main Mar 4, 2025
3 of 10 checks passed
@VeskeR VeskeR deleted the release/2.0.11 branch March 4, 2025 14:23
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Apr 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants