Skip to content

Conversation

@gmpinder
Copy link
Member

@gmpinder gmpinder commented Dec 9, 2025

This follows the new pattern in #503 for trying to be POSIX compatible or use nushell for modules. This does change the scripts module so that the snippets are executed with sh instead of bash. And it also fixes a bug where a user would create a multi-line snippet only for each line in that one multi-line snippet to be executed separately. Now the entire multi-line snippet entry will execute as one script.

@gmpinder gmpinder force-pushed the nushell-script-module branch 2 times, most recently from ed5eb48 to 58b04a1 Compare December 9, 2025 04:56
gmpinder and others added 5 commits December 26, 2025 09:35
This follows the new pattern in #503 for trying to be POSIX compatible or use nushell for modules. This does change the scripts module so that the snippets are executed with `sh` instead of `bash`. And it also fixes a bug where a user would create a multi-line snippet only for each line in that one multi-line snippet to be executed separately. Now the entire multi-line snippet entry will execute as one script.
Co-authored-by: xyny <60004820+xynydev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xyny <60004820+xynydev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xyny <60004820+xynydev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xyny <60004820+xynydev@users.noreply.github.com>
@gmpinder gmpinder force-pushed the nushell-script-module branch from f451c1c to b0325da Compare December 26, 2025 14:35
@gmpinder gmpinder merged commit ced173a into main Dec 28, 2025
5 checks passed
@gmpinder gmpinder deleted the nushell-script-module branch December 28, 2025 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants