Translate push-relabel from Kactl #79
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Owner
|
I think some formatting is necessary, but we can make those changes ourselves @bjorn-martinsson @Mukundan314 What are your thoughts |
Collaborator
|
Think the main thing is that we need to make sure that the implementation is correct. It also would be good to check that it runs fast enough to be useful in practice. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Push relabel is known to be much faster than Dinic and necessary for solving some flow problems with tighter time constraints. Here I translated Kactl's c++ version to python.
This translation is likely buggy and needs testing for correctness. It would also be nice to have a benchmark of how much faster it is.