CodeRabbit Generated Unit Tests: Add NUnit test project with ~103 tests and documentation #4

coderabbitai · 2025-12-21T03:07:23Z

Unit test generation was requested by @cklapperich.

unfinished work on animation optmization #3 (comment)

The following files were modified:

ArtExpander.sln
TESTING.md
Tests/AnimatedGhostCacheTests.cs
Tests/ArtCacheTests.cs
Tests/ArtExpander.Tests.csproj
Tests/FileNameToMonsterTypeResolverTests.cs
Tests/GENERATION_SUMMARY.md
Tests/PatchTests.cs
Tests/PluginIntegrationTests.cs
Tests/QUICKSTART.md
Tests/README.md
Tests/TEST_SUMMARY.md
Tests/TestHelpers/MockEnums.cs
Tests/ValidationAndEdgeCaseTests.cs

…ts and documentation

coderabbitai · 2025-12-21T03:07:29Z

Important

Review skipped

CodeRabbit bot authored PR detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

greptile-apps · 2025-12-21T03:13:28Z

Greptile Summary

Adds comprehensive unit test suite with 103 test methods across 7 test classes providing ~85% code coverage for the ArtExpander BepInEx plugin
Creates complete test infrastructure including NUnit project configuration, mock enums for game types, and helper methods for testing Unity-dependent components
Includes extensive documentation with TESTING.md, quickstart guide, and README files explaining test structure, limitations, and usage patterns for the new test suite

Important Files Changed

Filename	Overview
`Tests/ValidationAndEdgeCaseTests.cs`	Contains critical issues including test that expects NullReferenceException indicating poor error handling in production code
`Tests/ArtCacheTests.cs`	Core functionality tests for asset resolution and caching with proper PNG file creation and extensive coverage of fallback logic
`Tests/ArtExpander.Tests.csproj`	Test project configuration with Unity dependencies and game assembly references enabling proper testing of mod components
`ArtExpander.sln`	Solution file updated to include test project with proper build configurations for integration into development workflow

Confidence score: 3/5

This PR adds valuable testing infrastructure but contains concerning patterns that indicate underlying code quality issues
Score lowered due to explicit expectation of NullReferenceException in validation tests, hardcoded binary data making tests brittle, potential race conditions in concurrency tests, and incomplete documentation files
Pay close attention to Tests/ValidationAndEdgeCaseTests.cs which reveals error handling deficiencies that should be addressed in the main codebase

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant "dotnet test"
    participant "Test Runner"
    participant "FileNameToMonsterTypeResolverTests"
    participant "ArtCacheTests"
    participant "AnimatedGhostCacheTests"
    participant "PatchTests"
    participant "PluginIntegrationTests"
    participant "ValidationAndEdgeCaseTests"

    User->>+"dotnet test": "Run ArtExpander.Tests.csproj"
    "dotnet test"->>+"Test Runner": "Load test assembly"
    "Test Runner"->>+"FileNameToMonsterTypeResolverTests": "Execute 25+ tests"
    "FileNameToMonsterTypeResolverTests"-->>-"Test Runner": "Test results"
    
    "Test Runner"->>+"ArtCacheTests": "Execute 35+ tests"
    "ArtCacheTests"-->>-"Test Runner": "Test results"
    
    "Test Runner"->>+"AnimatedGhostCacheTests": "Execute 30+ tests" 
    "AnimatedGhostCacheTests"-->>-"Test Runner": "Test results"
    
    "Test Runner"->>+"PatchTests": "Execute 15+ tests"
    "PatchTests"-->>-"Test Runner": "Test results"
    
    "Test Runner"->>+"PluginIntegrationTests": "Execute 15+ tests"
    "PluginIntegrationTests"-->>-"Test Runner": "Test results"
    
    "Test Runner"->>+"ValidationAndEdgeCaseTests": "Execute 30+ tests"
    "ValidationAndEdgeCaseTests"-->>-"Test Runner": "Test results"
    
    "Test Runner"-->>-"dotnet test": "Aggregate test results"
    "dotnet test"-->>-User: "Test summary (103 tests)"

greptile-apps

_{14 files reviewed, 7 comments}

_{Edit Code Review Agent Settings | Greptile}

greptile-apps · 2025-12-21T03:13:25Z

Tests/QUICKSTART.md

+## Expected Results
+
+### With .NET SDK Available
+If `dotnet` CLI is available, you should see output like:


syntax: file appears to be truncated - the sentence ends abruptly with 'like:'

Prompt To Fix With AI

This is a comment left during a code review. Path: Tests/QUICKSTART.md Line: 108:108 Comment: **syntax:** file appears to be truncated - the sentence ends abruptly with 'like:' How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.

greptile-apps · 2025-12-21T03:13:25Z

Tests/AnimatedGhostCacheTests.cs

+            }
+
+            [Test]
+            public void Should_ReturnTrue_WhenAnimationAlreadyLoaded()


style: Test method name suggests 'Should_ReturnTrue' but the test actually validates returning false

_{Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!}

Prompt To Fix With AI

This is a comment left during a code review. Path: Tests/AnimatedGhostCacheTests.cs Line: 192:192 Comment: **style:** Test method name suggests 'Should_ReturnTrue' but the test actually validates returning false <sub>Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!</sub> How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.

greptile-apps · 2025-12-21T03:13:26Z

Tests/PatchTests.cs

+
+                // Arrange
+                bool result = Plugin.animated_ghost_cache.TryGetAnimation(
+                    EMonsterType.TestMonster,


logic: EMonsterType.TestMonster may not exist in the actual enum - consider using a valid enum value or creating a mock. Does TestMonster actually exist in the EMonsterType enum?

Prompt To Fix With AI

This is a comment left during a code review. Path: Tests/PatchTests.cs Line: 160:160 Comment: **logic:** `EMonsterType.TestMonster` may not exist in the actual enum - consider using a valid enum value or creating a mock. Does `TestMonster` actually exist in the `EMonsterType` enum? How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.

greptile-apps · 2025-12-21T03:13:26Z

Tests/TEST_SUMMARY.md

+
+### Unity Runtime Dependencies
+Components requiring Unity runtime have limited test coverage:
+- `GhostCardAnimatedRenderer` - MonoBehaviour lifecycle


syntax: Class name inconsistency: references GhostCardAnimatedRenderer but codebase shows GhostCardAnimator

Suggested change

- `GhostCardAnimatedRenderer` - MonoBehaviour lifecycle

- `GhostCardAnimator` - MonoBehaviour lifecycle

Prompt To Fix With AI

This is a comment left during a code review. Path: Tests/TEST_SUMMARY.md Line: 119:119 Comment: **syntax:** Class name inconsistency: references `GhostCardAnimatedRenderer` but codebase shows `GhostCardAnimator` ```suggestion - `GhostCardAnimator` - MonoBehaviour lifecycle ``` How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.

greptile-apps · 2025-12-21T03:13:27Z

Tests/PluginIntegrationTests.cs

+                Assert.IsNotNull(Plugin.art_cache);
+                Assert.IsInstanceOf<ArtCache>(Plugin.art_cache);


logic: These tests depend on static Plugin instances being initialized, which may fail if the Plugin.Awake() method hasn't been called during test execution. Are the Plugin.art_cache and Plugin.animated_ghost_cache static fields properly initialized in a test environment without the BepInEx framework running?

Prompt To Fix With AI

This is a comment left during a code review. Path: Tests/PluginIntegrationTests.cs Line: 18:19 Comment: **logic:** These tests depend on static Plugin instances being initialized, which may fail if the Plugin.Awake() method hasn't been called during test execution. Are the Plugin.art_cache and Plugin.animated_ghost_cache static fields properly initialized in a test environment without the BepInEx framework running? How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.

greptile-apps · 2025-12-21T03:13:27Z

Tests/ValidationAndEdgeCaseTests.cs

+                Assert.Throws<NullReferenceException>(() =>
+                    FileNameToMonsterTypeResolver.TryResolveMonsterType(null, out var type));


logic: Test expects NullReferenceException, indicating the underlying code doesn't handle null inputs properly. Consider updating FileNameToMonsterTypeResolver to return false instead of throwing. Should the FileNameToMonsterTypeResolver handle null inputs gracefully instead of throwing exceptions?

Prompt To Fix With AI

This is a comment left during a code review. Path: Tests/ValidationAndEdgeCaseTests.cs Line: 328:329 Comment: **logic:** Test expects NullReferenceException, indicating the underlying code doesn't handle null inputs properly. Consider updating FileNameToMonsterTypeResolver to return false instead of throwing. Should the FileNameToMonsterTypeResolver handle null inputs gracefully instead of throwing exceptions? How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.

greptile-apps · 2025-12-21T03:13:28Z

Tests/ValidationAndEdgeCaseTests.cs

+                    var tasks = new System.Threading.Tasks.Task[20];
+                    for (int i = 0; i < 20; i++)
+                    {
+                        tasks[i] = System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Run(() =>
+                        {
+                            for (int j = 0; j < 50; j++)
+                            {
+                                cache.ResolveArtPath(
+                                    EMonsterType.PiggyA,
+                                    ECardBorderType.Base,
+                                    ECardExpansionType.Tetramon,
+                                    false);
+                            }
+                        });
+                    }
+
+                    // Assert
+                    Assert.DoesNotThrow(() => System.Threading.Tasks.Task.WaitAll(tasks));


logic: Concurrency test may have race conditions. The test assumes ResolveArtPath is thread-safe but doesn't verify data consistency or use proper synchronization primitives to validate thread safety. Is ResolveArtPath actually thread-safe, and should this test verify data consistency rather than just absence of exceptions?

Prompt To Fix With AI

This is a comment left during a code review. Path: Tests/ValidationAndEdgeCaseTests.cs Line: 154:171 Comment: **logic:** Concurrency test may have race conditions. The test assumes ResolveArtPath is thread-safe but doesn't verify data consistency or use proper synchronization primitives to validate thread safety. Is ResolveArtPath actually thread-safe, and should this test verify data consistency rather than just absence of exceptions? How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.

CodeRabbit Generated Unit Tests: Add NUnit test project with ~103 tes…

be65909

…ts and documentation

coderabbitai bot requested a review from cklapperich December 21, 2025 03:07

coderabbitai bot assigned cklapperich Dec 21, 2025

coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 21, 2025

unfinished work on animation optmization #3

Open

greptile-apps bot reviewed Dec 21, 2025

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

CodeRabbit Generated Unit Tests: Add NUnit test project with ~103 tests and documentation #4

CodeRabbit Generated Unit Tests: Add NUnit test project with ~103 tests and documentation #4

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 21, 2025

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 21, 2025

Review skipped

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot commented Dec 21, 2025

Important Files Changed

Sequence Diagram

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot left a comment

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot Dec 21, 2025

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot Dec 21, 2025

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot Dec 21, 2025

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot Dec 21, 2025

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot Dec 21, 2025

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot Dec 21, 2025

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot Dec 21, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

	- `GhostCardAnimatedRenderer` - MonoBehaviour lifecycle
	- `GhostCardAnimator` - MonoBehaviour lifecycle

		Assert.IsNotNull(Plugin.art_cache);
		Assert.IsInstanceOf<ArtCache>(Plugin.art_cache);

		Assert.Throws<NullReferenceException>(() =>
		FileNameToMonsterTypeResolver.TryResolveMonsterType(null, out var type));

CodeRabbit Generated Unit Tests: Add NUnit test project with ~103 tests and documentation #4

Are you sure you want to change the base?

CodeRabbit Generated Unit Tests: Add NUnit test project with ~103 tests and documentation #4

Uh oh!

Conversation

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 21, 2025

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 21, 2025

Review skipped

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot commented Dec 21, 2025

Greptile Summary

Important Files Changed

Confidence score: 3/5

Sequence Diagram

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot Dec 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot Dec 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot Dec 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot Dec 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot Dec 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot Dec 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot Dec 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants