Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link
Contributor

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Jan 16, 2026

📄 1,995% (19.95x) speedup for tridiagonal_solve_jax in code_to_optimize/sample_code.py

⏱️ Runtime : 42.9 milliseconds 2.05 milliseconds (best of 5 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimized code achieves a 20x speedup (1995%) by applying JAX's Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation via the @jit decorator to tridiagonal_solve_jax.

Key optimization:

  • JIT compilation: The @jit decorator compiles the entire function into optimized XLA (Accelerated Linear Algebra) machine code on first execution, then reuses this compiled version for subsequent calls.

Why this is dramatically faster:

  1. Eliminates Python interpreter overhead: Without JIT, every array operation and function call goes through Python's interpreter. The line profiler shows that even simple operations like c[0] / b[0] took ~1.17 seconds across 31 calls (~38ms each). JIT removes this overhead entirely by compiling to native code.

  2. Operator fusion: JAX can fuse multiple array operations into single kernels. For example, operations like (d_i - a_i * d_prev) / denom become a single fused kernel instead of separate subtract, multiply, and divide operations, reducing memory bandwidth requirements.

  3. Optimizes the scan operations: The two lax.scan calls (forward and backward passes) benefit significantly from JIT. The profiler shows these took ~515ms and ~348ms respectively in the original code. JIT enables better loop unrolling and vectorization within the scan kernels.

  4. Reduces array creation overhead: Multiple jnp.concatenate and jnp.array calls (totaling ~644ms in the profiler) are optimized away or compiled into efficient buffer operations.

Impact: This optimization is particularly effective for the tridiagonal solver because it's called repeatedly (31 times in the profile), and JIT compilation amortizes the one-time compilation cost across all invocations. The optimization benefits any workload that calls this function multiple times with similarly-shaped inputs, making it ideal for numerical PDE solvers, time-stepping algorithms, or batch processing scenarios.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 18 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 🔘 None Found
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
⚙️ Click to see Existing Unit Tests
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
test_jax_jit_code.py::TestTridiagonalSolveJax.test_diagonal_system 14.8ms 223μs 6515%✅
test_jax_jit_code.py::TestTridiagonalSolveJax.test_larger_system 14.6ms 1.54ms 846%✅
test_jax_jit_code.py::TestTridiagonalSolveJax.test_simple_system 13.5ms 278μs 4745%✅

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-tridiagonal_solve_jax-mkggf6xm and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimized code achieves a **20x speedup** (1995%) by applying JAX's Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation via the `@jit` decorator to `tridiagonal_solve_jax`.

**Key optimization:**
- **JIT compilation**: The `@jit` decorator compiles the entire function into optimized XLA (Accelerated Linear Algebra) machine code on first execution, then reuses this compiled version for subsequent calls.

**Why this is dramatically faster:**

1. **Eliminates Python interpreter overhead**: Without JIT, every array operation and function call goes through Python's interpreter. The line profiler shows that even simple operations like `c[0] / b[0]` took ~1.17 seconds across 31 calls (~38ms each). JIT removes this overhead entirely by compiling to native code.

2. **Operator fusion**: JAX can fuse multiple array operations into single kernels. For example, operations like `(d_i - a_i * d_prev) / denom` become a single fused kernel instead of separate subtract, multiply, and divide operations, reducing memory bandwidth requirements.

3. **Optimizes the scan operations**: The two `lax.scan` calls (forward and backward passes) benefit significantly from JIT. The profiler shows these took ~515ms and ~348ms respectively in the original code. JIT enables better loop unrolling and vectorization within the scan kernels.

4. **Reduces array creation overhead**: Multiple `jnp.concatenate` and `jnp.array` calls (totaling ~644ms in the profiler) are optimized away or compiled into efficient buffer operations.

**Impact**: This optimization is particularly effective for the tridiagonal solver because it's called repeatedly (31 times in the profile), and JIT compilation amortizes the one-time compilation cost across all invocations. The optimization benefits any workload that calls this function multiple times with similarly-shaped inputs, making it ideal for numerical PDE solvers, time-stepping algorithms, or batch processing scenarios.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from aseembits93 January 16, 2026 05:45
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Jan 16, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant