Skip to content

Conversation

@mar-js
Copy link

@mar-js mar-js commented Oct 3, 2025

No description provided.

@mar-js mar-js self-assigned this Oct 3, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @mar-js, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request represents a routine regeneration of the SDK, bringing it to version 7.0.6. The primary functional change involves a refactoring of the plan_ids attribute, which is now directly part of the Checkout model instead of being nested within the CheckoutOrderTemplate. This adjustment ensures the SDK aligns with the latest API specification and improves the clarity of the model structure.

Highlights

  • SDK Version Update: The SDK has been updated to version 7.0.6 across all relevant configuration and source files.
  • Model Refactoring: The plan_ids field has been moved from the CheckoutOrderTemplate model to the Checkout model, reflecting a structural change in how plan IDs are associated with checkout processes.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request regenerates the SDK, bumping the package version from 7.0.5 to 7.0.6 and relocating the plan_ids field from the CheckoutOrderTemplate model to the Checkout model. While the code changes appear consistent with this relocation, moving plan_ids is a breaking API change. According to Semantic Versioning, breaking changes should trigger a major version increment (e.g., to 8.0.0), not a patch-level one. Releasing this as a patch could cause unexpected failures for users who upgrade. It is highly recommended to adjust the version number to reflect this breaking change before merging.

@mar-js mar-js merged commit 38d9e02 into main Oct 9, 2025
12 checks passed
@mar-js mar-js deleted the feature/AI-474 branch October 9, 2025 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants