Skip to content

Conversation

@AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

The statement that glyphs are used to identify members of the basic character set does not belong separating two sentences introducing and then defining preprocessing tokens.

Also, we do not exlusively use glyphs for this purpose but also directly call out Unicode code points too, so tone down the phrasing to glyphs are often used to ...

@eisenwave eisenwave added the P3-Other Triaged issue not in P1 or P2 label Nov 5, 2025
@AlisdairM AlisdairM force-pushed the move_glyph_documentation branch from 0df6fc5 to cbdbe3d Compare November 12, 2025 22:51
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the changes requested Changes to the wording or approach have been requested and not yet applied. label Dec 6, 2025
@AlisdairM AlisdairM force-pushed the move_glyph_documentation branch from cbdbe3d to 036f558 Compare December 6, 2025 09:03
@AlisdairM AlisdairM requested a review from jensmaurer December 6, 2025 09:03
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added after-motions Pull request is to be applied after the pending edits from WG21 straw polls have been applied. and removed changes requested Changes to the wording or approach have been requested and not yet applied. labels Dec 6, 2025
@tkoeppe tkoeppe added the needs rebase The pull request needs a git rebase to resolve merge conflicts. label Dec 15, 2025
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Dec 15, 2025

@AlisdairM: Please rebase.

The statement that glyphs are used to identify members of the
basic character set does not belong separating two sentences
introducing and then defining preprocessing tokens.

Also, we do not *exlusively* use glyphs for this purpose but
also directly call out Unicode code points too, so tone down
the phrasing to glyphs are *often* used to ...
@AlisdairM AlisdairM force-pushed the move_glyph_documentation branch from 036f558 to b88985d Compare December 15, 2025 02:16
@AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor Author

This has been rebased, and should be ready to merge.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed the needs rebase The pull request needs a git rebase to resolve merge conflicts. label Dec 15, 2025
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@tkoeppe , this is ready now.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 9a06fbf into cplusplus:main Dec 15, 2025
2 checks passed
@AlisdairM AlisdairM deleted the move_glyph_documentation branch December 15, 2025 13:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

after-motions Pull request is to be applied after the pending edits from WG21 straw polls have been applied. P3-Other Triaged issue not in P1 or P2

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants