Benchmarks the GET elections proxy #115
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
With many elections the GET elections call cab be slow, >10s to get 15 elections. I suspect the deserialization to be the responsible for that and implemented a "light" version. However results are not convincing.
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2280530723
💛 - Coveralls |
ineiti
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2024
Don't let non-form-owner add voters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With many elections the GET elections call cab be slow, >10s to get 15 elections.
I suspect the deserialization to be the responsible for that and implemented a "light" version. However results are not convincing.
This is not meant to be merged.
(metric is ns/op *1k)