Skip to content

Conversation

@xlei-duoce
Copy link
Contributor

GEMにてEntityViewのセクションに高さを設定可能にする (ドキュメント対応) 修正

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds documentation for a new feature that allows setting height configurations for EntityView sections in GEM (Generic Entity Manager). The update corrects and enhances documentation across multiple component types.

  • Adds "Max Height" configuration documentation for various TopView parts (TreeView, Calendar, Dashboard, SavedList, Aggregation)
  • Adds height configuration for SearchResult List and entity view sections
  • Updates existing height-related documentation with more consistent naming

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 9 out of 9 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
workflow/setting.adoc Adds "Parts Height" configuration for task list content area
genericentitymanager/treeview/setting.adoc Adds "Max Height" configuration for TreeView parts
genericentitymanager/topview/setting.adoc Adds "Max Height" configuration for various TopView components (announcement, script, template, separator)
genericentitymanager/entityview/genericentityview.adoc Fixes typo in "Table Hight" → "Table Height" and adds "Max Height" configuration
genericentitymanager/entityview/detaillayout.adoc Adds section height configuration in Japanese ("セクションの高さ")
genericentitymanager/calendar/setting.adoc Adds "Max Height" configuration for Calendar parts
entitylisting/savedlist.adoc Adds "Max Height" configuration for SavedList parts
aggregation/dashboard.adoc Adds "Max Height" configuration for Dashboard parts
aggregation/aggregation.adoc Adds "Max Height" configuration for aggregation parts

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@xlei-duoce xlei-duoce self-assigned this Jan 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant