Skip to content

Conversation

@spoorcc
Copy link
Contributor

@spoorcc spoorcc commented Jan 2, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the project's ignore file configuration to expand coverage of tracked files and directories.
    • Added a new configuration file to enable automated code review features, including auto-review capabilities and interactive chat support for enhanced collaboration during code review.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 2, 2026

Walkthrough

Configuration changes to the repository: removal of a file path from the ignore list and introduction of a new CodeRabbit configuration file with language, review, and chat settings.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Configuration Files
.korbitignore, .coderabbit.yaml
.korbitignore: Removed doc/_ext/sphinxcontrib_asciinema/_static from ignored paths.
.coderabbit.yaml: New configuration file added with language (en-US), review settings (profile: chill, auto_review enabled), and chat auto-reply enabled.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Config-coderabbit' refers to the main change (adding CodeRabbit configuration), but is generic and lacks specificity about what the configuration accomplishes.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61a02fb and 254d046.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: run / run (macos-latest, 3.14)
  • GitHub Check: run / run (windows-latest, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: run / run (macos-latest, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: run / run (ubuntu-latest, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: run / test-cygwin
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: DevContainer Build & Test
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)

1-14: Excellent! The critical issue has been resolved.

The file has been successfully moved to the correct location at the repository root. All configuration values are valid and conform to the CodeRabbit schema:

  • Language and early access settings are properly configured
  • Review profile is set to "chill" (less assertive feedback)
  • Auto-review is enabled for non-draft PRs
  • Chat auto-reply is enabled

The configuration is ready to use.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@spoorcc
Copy link
Contributor Author

spoorcc commented Jan 3, 2026

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 3, 2026

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 16ec570 and 61a02fb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/.coderabbit.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.9)
.github/workflows/.coderabbit.yaml

3-3: "jobs" section is missing in workflow

(syntax-check)


3-3: "on" section is missing in workflow

(syntax-check)


3-3: unexpected key "language" for "workflow" section. expected one of "concurrency", "defaults", "env", "jobs", "name", "on", "permissions", "run-name"

(syntax-check)


4-4: unexpected key "early_access" for "workflow" section. expected one of "concurrency", "defaults", "env", "jobs", "name", "on", "permissions", "run-name"

(syntax-check)


5-5: unexpected key "reviews" for "workflow" section. expected one of "concurrency", "defaults", "env", "jobs", "name", "on", "permissions", "run-name"

(syntax-check)


13-13: unexpected key "chat" for "workflow" section. expected one of "concurrency", "defaults", "env", "jobs", "name", "on", "permissions", "run-name"

(syntax-check)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (16)
  • GitHub Check: Publish Python distribution 📦 to TestPyPI
  • GitHub Check: build / build (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: build / build (macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: build / build (ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: run / run (macos-latest, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: run / run (windows-latest, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: run / run (windows-latest, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: run / run (macos-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: run / run (windows-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: run / run (windows-latest, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: run / run (windows-latest, 3.14)
  • GitHub Check: run / run (windows-latest, 3.10)
  • GitHub Check: run / test-cygwin
  • GitHub Check: DevContainer Build & Test
  • GitHub Check: test

@spoorcc spoorcc merged commit 653649c into main Jan 3, 2026
39 checks passed
@spoorcc spoorcc deleted the config-coderabbit branch January 3, 2026 11:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants