Skip to content

Conversation

@nagilson
Copy link
Member

@nagilson nagilson commented Jan 22, 2026

In this PR, I add onto the proposal from @baronfel (#353) to include a direct comparison, showing some of what I researched about nvm and how we thought about it when designing dotnetup.

Some of this is pretty specific into technical detail and I want to avoid this document becoming huge and unreviewable. @baronfel's document also is a larger picture sell rather than a dive into the specifics, however I thought it would be helpful to have this information here. We can close these changes if we disagree and move it elsewhere.

I tried to briefly touch on the topics without duplicating what will go into dotnet/sdk/documentation/dotnetup - the hive defaults and path handling alone will be their own documents. It can take several pages to explain.

In this PR, I add onto the proposal from @baronfel to include a direct comparison, showing some of what I researched about `nvm` and  how  we thought about it when designing  `dotnetup`.

Some of this is pretty specific into technical detail and I want to avoid this document becoming huge and unreviewable. @baronfel's document also is a larger picture sell rather than a dive into the specifics, however I thought it would be helpful to have this information here. We can close these changes if we disagree and move it elsewhere.

I tried to briefly touch on the topics without duplicating what will go into `dotnet/sdk/documentation/dotnetup` -  the `hive` defaults and `path` handling alone will be their own documents. It can take several pages to explain.
More of this is generated text, but I've modified it and done some fact checking.
@nagilson nagilson marked this pull request as ready for review January 22, 2026 00:46
Co-authored-by: Jan Kotas <jkotas@microsoft.com>
@nagilson nagilson merged commit 2382f37 into baronfel-patch-1 Jan 23, 2026
3 checks passed
@nagilson nagilson deleted the nagilson-add-comparison-nvm-dotnetup-to-baronfel-spec branch January 23, 2026 22:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants