-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
Feature/linkedin click uri updates #120
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/linkedin click uri updates #120
Conversation
| # - package: fivetran/linkedin | ||
| # version: [">=0.10.0", "<0.11.0"] | ||
|
|
||
| - git: https://github.com/fivetran/dbt_linkedin.git | ||
| revision: feature/click-uri-updates | ||
| warn-unpinned: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will update before merge and release
fivetran-reneeli
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
fivetran-avinash
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
fivetran-catfritz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@fivetran-joemarkiewicz One small changelog comment. I was able to run the package updates and see that the click_uri coalesce is working properly, and the click_uri_type is populated correctly. I also tested the partitioning and source_relation logic, and that is compiling correctly. LGTM!
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
| - If necessary, you can populate historical data in the `age_groups` column by performing a resync of the `ADGROUP_HISTORY` table, since TikTok provides all data regardless of the previous sync state. | ||
| - For more details, see the [DECISIONLOG entry](https://github.com/fivetran/dbt_tiktok_ads_source/blob/main/DECISIONLOG.md). | ||
|
|
||
| # dbt_ad_reporting v1.10.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this meant to be part of v1.11.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup! It looks like this was leftover from the merge conflicts. Updated.
* release/v0.11.0 * Update CHANGELOG.md * Feature/linkedin click uri updates (#120) * feature/linkedin-click-uri-updates * docs regen and integration schema change * changelog update * integration test merge conflict address * changelog fix * another changelog fix * schema change * Apply suggestions from code review * Update README.md (#124) * Update README.md :) * Apply suggestions from code review --------- Co-authored-by: Joe Markiewicz <74217849+fivetran-joemarkiewicz@users.noreply.github.com> * contributor changelog update * Update CHANGELOG.md * regen docs --------- Co-authored-by: Joe Markiewicz <74217849+fivetran-joemarkiewicz@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: conrad-mal <conraddick@gmail.com>
PR Overview
This PR will address the following Issue/Feature: dbt_linkedin Issue fivetran/dbt_linkedin_source#35
This PR will result in the following new package version:
v1.11.0This will be a breaking change as a result of the upstream dbt_linkedin and dbt_linkedin_source updates.
Please provide the finalized CHANGELOG entry which details the relevant changes included in this PR:
PR Checklist
Basic Validation
Please acknowledge that you have successfully performed the following commands locally:
Before marking this PR as "ready for review" the following have been applied:
❗ Special Updates for Ad Reporting ❗
To reduce integration testing time, not all models should be enabled in the
run_models.shvars. Update the variables afterdbt runanddbt testto set:truetrue(if not already)falseDetailed Validation
Please share any and all of your validation steps:
Please see the upstream PRs for relevant validations:
Additionally, please see the passing validation tests below:

If you had to summarize this PR in an emoji, which would it be?
🔗