Skip to content

Conversation

@0xh3rman
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@semanticdiff-com
Copy link

semanticdiff-com bot commented Jan 20, 2026

Review changes with  SemanticDiff

Changed Files
File Status
  pnpm-lock.yaml  42% smaller
  apps/api/src/index.ts  11% smaller
  packages/swapper/package.json  1% smaller

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @0xh3rman, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on a routine maintenance task of updating core dependencies for the TON blockchain swapper functionality. The primary goal is to ensure the project remains current with the latest versions of its external libraries, thereby benefiting from bug fixes, performance improvements, and new features. Additionally, a small but important type safety adjustment was made in the API layer to enhance code robustness.

Highlights

  • Dependency Updates: Key swapper-related dependencies, including @ston-fi/api, @ston-fi/sdk, and @ton/ton, have been upgraded to their latest versions to ensure compatibility and leverage new features.
  • Type Safety Improvement: A minor TypeScript enhancement was introduced in the API module, explicitly casting providerId to a string to improve type inference and reduce potential runtime errors.
  • Lockfile Synchronization: The pnpm-lock.yaml file has been updated to accurately reflect the new dependency versions and their transitive resolutions, maintaining a consistent and reproducible build environment.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates several dependencies for the TON swapper, including a major version bump for @ton/ton. It also includes a small code change to add a type assertion in the API. My review includes a suggestion to improve the type safety and robustness of the API middleware by replacing the type assertion with a proper runtime check. The dependency updates seem correct based on the PR's intent.

@0xh3rman 0xh3rman merged commit 1bc00c1 into main Jan 21, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants