Skip to content

Conversation

@Kangie
Copy link

@Kangie Kangie commented Aug 10, 2023

Closes: #35

@thesamesam looks fine to me, I decided to call this 0.6.0 and do some other housekeeping. There doesn't seem to be any unit tests but the output against real ebuild targets looks good.

If you'd sanity check, tag, and update ::gentoo I'd appreciate it!

Edit: target/debug/cargo-ebuild ebuild --manifest-path ./Cargo.toml looks really good

Kangie added 3 commits August 10, 2023 18:20
- Change author to Gentoo Rust Project
- Update README
- Bump dependencies
- Misc auto updates
@joakim-tjernlund
Copy link

@gyakovlev ping?

@dongsupark
Copy link

Any chance this PR could be merged?
I just hit the issue of cargo-ebuild not being able to deal with the new CRATES syntax. i.e. @ instead of -.

@thesamesam
Copy link
Member

I don't have commit access to cargo-ebuild although I could give it to myself given gyak is AWOL. FWIW, we recommend using pycargoebuild now if yo ucan.

@dongsupark
Copy link

@thesamesam Thank you for the info.
pycargoebuild seem to work well in my Gentoo VM. However, that tool relies on Gentoo specific paths.
Ideally I would like to generate ebuild files on both Gentoo and non-Gentoo systems. cargo-ebuild is perfect for the purpose. But it is too bad not being actively maintained.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support new CRATES syntax

4 participants