Skip to content

Conversation

@hitchhooker
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Authorize GeoDNS modification to route China mainland traffic from SEA region to
US West Coast (luckyfriday).

Background

Rotko Networks currently handles 34.2% of IBP GeoDNS traffic volume (12.6M
requests), approximately 13x the volume of luckyfriday (779.4K requests).
Despite 2Gbps IPv4 and 12Gbps IPv6 transit capacity, MVR alerts occur during
peak hours due to China routing inefficiencies.

China premium transit pricing ranges $30-50/Mbit/s, with $25/Mbit/s as the
floor. Current IBP Asia reimbursement rate of $0.0731/GB does not support this.

The China Boomerang

TSEA providers peer with Chinese ISPs at US West Coast exchanges. Traffic from
China to Hong Kong transits the Pacific twice aka. "the China Boomerang".

Bangkok → Hong Kong: 45ms
Hong Kong → China mainland: +180ms (US West Coast round-trip)

Measured latencies (source):

Rotko Bangkok → China Latency
Guangzhou (Tencent) 221ms
Shanghai (Aliyun) 211ms
Chengdu (Tencent) 240ms
Hubei (China Unicom) 377ms

Luckyfriday US West (source):

Luckyfriday → China Latency
Guangzhou (Tencent) 180ms
Shanghai (Tencent) 172ms
Chengdu (Tencent) 203ms
Lishui (China Unicom) 188ms

US West Coast provides 30-50ms lower latency to China mainland than SEA
endpoints.

Proposal

Upon passing, this RFC authorizes Rotko to implement GeoDNS steering rules
routing China mainland origin traffic from SEA to luckyfriday. GEODNS in its
current state does not have this feature set, but we are more than happy to
implement it.

Load redistribution reduces peak hour pressure on highest-volume node while
improving latency for affected users.


Vote

  • 👍 = Aye
  • 👎 = Nay

@hitchhooker
Copy link
Contributor Author

image to demonstrate what i mean here: afaik sin01 -> sintra, portugal so complete boomerang around the world from China Unicom to HGC(hong kong largest ISP)

@miloskriz
Copy link

Hi @hitchhooker,

As soon as this is approved I can implement this in ibp.network in a couple of minutes... 🫡

It would be, however, ideal that we could welcome a new pro member inside the China territory... hopefully something to think about in the new proposal.. @senseless @tugytur ?

Cheers!!

Milos

@senseless
Copy link
Contributor

We definitely need another Asian location to handle that traffic. I'm working on some things but they will take some time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants