-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Logic-based argumentation extension of keml.analysis #7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: logic-based-argumentation
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
ReadMe.md
Outdated
| This project analyses KEML files statistically. For each KEML file it produces: | ||
| 1) [General Statistics](#general-statistics) | ||
| 2) [Argumentation Statistics](#argumentation-statistics) | ||
| 2) [Argumentation data](#argumentation-data) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe you can find a better name? Is this about symbols?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reading further, I think this is the whole logic part, right? you have symbols an dconstructed logical formulas. So what about logical argumentation?
| /** | ||
| * a <b>static</b> method that creates a String representation of a given {@link ArgumentTree} | ||
| * @param node {@link ArgumentTree} to be represented | ||
| * @param prefix String prefix to facilitate recursive call. Should be empty ("") during first call |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we really need this? I think the helper is handling the prefix itself. Do you need to go back and call this method from the helper?
No description provided.