Skip to content

Conversation

@upodroid
Copy link
Member

@upodroid upodroid commented Dec 6, 2025

No description provided.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config area/jobs labels Dec 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/testgrid sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. labels Dec 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: upodroid

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Dec 6, 2025
@upodroid upodroid force-pushed the kops-azure-conformance-jobs branch 3 times, most recently from 9b72d6f to 8c5a291 Compare December 6, 2025 14:09
@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
dashboards:
- name: conformance-kind No newline at end of file
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this should really be a seperate commit and/or PR

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I split it to 2 commits.

- conformance-apisnoop
- conformance-ec2
- conformance-gce
- conformance-azure
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it probably makes more sense to have a conformance-kops dashboard, that will have a lot more to do with if conformance works than the cloud provider used. ec2 and GCE here are generally bad shorthands for specific tools

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We already have this board that tracks kops conformance jobs. https://testgrid.k8s.io/kops-conformance. These jobs run on cloud X and arch Y so we want to link them to their respective conformance boards too.

@upodroid upodroid force-pushed the kops-azure-conformance-jobs branch from 8c5a291 to 144dbe7 Compare December 6, 2025 20:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config area/jobs area/testgrid cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants