-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Add Codecov #38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Codecov #38
Conversation
Welcome to Codecov 🎉Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests. Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️ |
|
Looks like this is successfully using code coverage when running tests and uploading it so I think it's ready for review! |
ciortiz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems to me that this pull request does the following:
- Each Python version will have its own nox session, and we only care to run code coverage for the Python 3.11 version (which is fine if we care to only run code coverage once).
- Code coverage will report back regardless of the success of and without waiting for (presumably)
ci.yml. - Nox sessions' procedures with and without code coverage are defined via changes in
noxfile.py.
Looks good to me!
This pull request will close #11 and will make the github actions autocheck the testing coverage.