Skip to content

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

ldk-reviews-bot commented Sep 29, 2025

👋 Thanks for assigning @valentinewallace as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@valentinewallace
Copy link
Contributor

CI sad

@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cause ldk 0.2 isn't uploaded yet :)

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt changed the title Update to 0.2.0-beta1 Update to 0.2.0-beta1 and minor tweaks Sep 29, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@valentinewallace valentinewallace left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt force-pushed the main branch 3 times, most recently from 7c8461b to 009a548 Compare October 4, 2025 13:40
Naively update to LDK 0.2 using the sync wrappers to keep current
behavior.
@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt changed the title Update to 0.2.0-beta1 and minor tweaks Update to 0.2.0 and minor tweaks Dec 16, 2025
@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt force-pushed the main branch 3 times, most recently from 5dfcae9 to 3ca27b5 Compare December 16, 2025 20:38
With LDK 0.2, most traits now offer async variants. In the previous
commit we ignored these but here we migrate to them everywhere
except in the `ChannelMonitor` persistence.

Note that we have to switch to async stdin reading in cli.rs to
ensure we always reach an `await` point in a timely manner on all
tasks.
@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt force-pushed the main branch 5 times, most recently from 29c4033 to e0ad51d Compare December 16, 2025 21:03
Its always been a bit strange that we persist the addresses of our
peers to disk when there's a public gossip db, its not really a
thing most LN nodes do. It might be useful for private channels but
there's not a lot of reason to have it in `ldk-sample`.
@valentinewallace
Copy link
Contributor

I'm good with a squash. Also Windows CI is sad

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @valentinewallace! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants