Skip to content

Conversation

@luhhujbb
Copy link
Contributor

This PR makes the following changes:

  • add custom master configuration/slave only spot

Fully tested on our production environment

Fixes #82.

@devyn
Copy link

devyn commented Apr 2, 2023

@nchammas can this be merged in some form? it would be nice to have this feature - depending on the application, the master doesn't really need to be very beefy, but having bigger slaves can be better for performance (to a certain extent)

@nchammas
Copy link
Owner

nchammas commented Apr 2, 2023

My apologies to both @luhhujbb and @devyn about leaving this PR hanging. I won't have the capacity in the foreseeable future to review and shepherd this PR through to completion.

I would consider running a fork of Flintrock to get this feature. The instructions in the README should help you build your own version. If you have trouble doing that, please reach out and I will try to help.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Slave-only spot instances

3 participants