Skip to content

Conversation

@longbingljw
Copy link
Member

@longbingljw longbingljw commented Dec 29, 2025

Summary

Adjust readme and comments about tests.Test class name optimized.
close #96

Solution Description

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Clarified README testing section with separate, explicit commands for running unit vs. integration tests and updated referenced test examples.
  • Tests

    • Standardized many integration test class names and updated header docstrings for consistent naming and clearer test suite organization.
    • Added a new unit test validating version comparison/normalization.
  • Chores

    • Updated ignore rules to exclude test database artifact files.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 29, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR renames multiple integration test classes to remove "Refactored" suffixes, updates related module docstrings, clarifies test commands in README, and adds tests/seekdb.db/ to .gitignore. No functional code changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Configuration & Documentation
\.gitignore, README.md
Added tests/seekdb.db/ under a new # tests section in .gitignore. Updated README Testing section to separate unit and integration test commands and adjusted example test targets (unit-only vs integration-only).
Integration Tests — Class Renames
tests/integration_tests/test_admin_database_management.py, tests/integration_tests/test_client_creation.py, tests/integration_tests/test_collection_dml.py, tests/integration_tests/test_collection_embedding_function.py, tests/integration_tests/test_collection_hybrid_search.py, tests/integration_tests/test_collection_hybrid_search_builder_integration.py, tests/integration_tests/test_collection_query.py, tests/integration_tests/test_default_embedding_function.py, tests/integration_tests/test_fulltext_parser_config.py, tests/integration_tests/test_offical_case.py
Renamed test classes to remove Refactored suffix (e.g., TestXRefactoredTestX) and updated top-of-file docstring lines. Test implementations unchanged.
Integration Tests — Docstring & Test Additions
tests/integration_tests/test_collection_get.py, tests/integration_tests/test_detect_db_type_and_version.py, tests/integration_tests/test_empty_value_handling.py, tests/integration_tests/test_security_sql_injection.py
Edited module header/docstring wording to reference fixture usage and removed "REFACTORED" phrasing. Also added a new unit test test_version_comparison to test_detect_db_type_and_version.py (no DB interaction).

Sequence Diagram(s)

(omitted — changes are renames/documentation/config; no new multi-component control flow introduced)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • hnwyllmm

Poem

🐰 I hopped through tests and file alike,

Trimmed "Refactored" — what a tidy strike,
README clearer, ignores tucked away,
The warren's neat for another day,
A joyful nibble, then I play ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'feat: readme and comments about tests' directly corresponds to the PR's main objectives of updating README and test-related comments/class names.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The PR successfully addresses issue #96 by updating README testing documentation and optimizing test class names throughout the test suite.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed All changes are scoped to issue #96: README documentation updates, test class name refactoring, and comments clarification with no unrelated modifications.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 92.86% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5e5c6ab and b1b619d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/integration_tests/test_detect_db_type_and_version.py
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📚 Learning: 2025-12-22T12:33:52.528Z
Learnt from: longbingljw
Repo: oceanbase/pyseekdb PR: 91
File: tests/integration_tests/test_admin_database_management.py:26-39
Timestamp: 2025-12-22T12:33:52.528Z
Learning: In tests/integration_tests/test_admin_database_management.py, using `isinstance(admin_client._server, pyseekdb.SeekdbEmbeddedClient)` to detect client type is acceptable. AdminClient should not expose a public `mode` property.

Applied to files:

  • tests/integration_tests/test_detect_db_type_and_version.py
📚 Learning: 2025-12-22T12:44:52.456Z
Learnt from: longbingljw
Repo: oceanbase/pyseekdb PR: 91
File: tests/integration_tests/test_collection_dml.py:36-36
Timestamp: 2025-12-22T12:44:52.456Z
Learning: In integration tests under tests/integration_tests, it is acceptable to use the internal db_client._server._execute() to run raw SQL (e.g., CREATE TABLE) when needing custom table setup with specific vector index configurations. Prefer using public/test harness APIs for common setup, and clearly document and limit the use of internal calls to ensure test reliability. Ensure proper cleanup and isolation for each test, and avoid leaking internal APIs into production or non-test code.

Applied to files:

  • tests/integration_tests/test_detect_db_type_and_version.py
📚 Learning: 2025-12-22T12:45:51.412Z
Learnt from: longbingljw
Repo: oceanbase/pyseekdb PR: 91
File: tests/integration_tests/test_collection_hybrid_search_builder_integration.py:127-132
Timestamp: 2025-12-22T12:45:51.412Z
Learning: In integration test Python files under tests/integration_tests, it is acceptable to use string interpolation to construct SQL INSERT statements for test data when the data is controlled and internal to the test. This pattern should only be used for trusted, test-only data and not with untrusted input; ensure the injection risk is mitigated by keeping inputs deterministic, non-user-supplied, and isolated to the test environment. If possible, prefer parameterized queries in non-test code, but in these tests, interpolate values selectively when you can guarantee safety.

Applied to files:

  • tests/integration_tests/test_detect_db_type_and_version.py
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
tests/integration_tests/test_detect_db_type_and_version.py (2)
tests/unit_tests/test_version.py (1)
  • test_version_comparison (13-41)
src/pyseekdb/client/version.py (1)
  • Version (7-121)
🪛 Ruff (0.14.10)
tests/integration_tests/test_detect_db_type_and_version.py

40-40: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: integration-test (oceanbase)
  • GitHub Check: integration-test (server)
  • GitHub Check: integration-test (embedded)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/integration_tests/test_detect_db_type_and_version.py (1)

3-3: LGTM! Clear documentation improvement.

The updated docstring accurately describes the test coverage and fixture usage, improving clarity for maintainers.

Copy link
Member

@hnwyllmm hnwyllmm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@hnwyllmm hnwyllmm merged commit 05fee65 into oceanbase:develop Jan 8, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement]: readme need to updated related to tests

2 participants