Skip to content

Conversation

@Moniker1998
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #1568

@Moniker1998
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Moniker1998 commented Jan 6, 2026

I've changed my answer a bit, the previous version contained an error.

In particular now the theorem for ordinals is a corollary of the proof of the theorem in Mansfield's paper, rather than corollary of a theorem itself. In the sense that the more general statement can be proven in the same way.

@prabau
Copy link
Collaborator

prabau commented Jan 18, 2026

T821, 822: Would be convenient to add Mansfield to the refs, with text like this for example:
See {{mathse:...}}, based on results from {{zb:0078.14803}}.

@Moniker1998
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Moniker1998 commented Jan 18, 2026

@prabau

I've changed it, but not exactly how you wanted since it just isn't true that both of these theorems are entirely based off of results in Mansfield. One is a generalization of a proof, and the other also uses a result of Stone (I believe) in Lutzer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Theorem Suggestion: Two theorems about GO-spaces and ordinal spaces

4 participants